Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature: Document Blueprint Folders #1592

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 12, 2024
Merged

Feature: Document Blueprint Folders #1592

merged 3 commits into from Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

loivsen
Copy link
Contributor

@loivsen loivsen commented Apr 12, 2024 •
edited

Description

Document Blueprint Folders

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Chore (minor updates related to the tooling or maintenance of the repository, does not impact compiled assets)

@loivsen loivsen marked this pull request as ready for review April 12, 2024 13:33
leekelleher
leekelleher approved these changes Apr 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@leekelleher leekelleher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested out, working as expected. 👍

@leekelleher leekelleher merged commit 6a5c97e into main Apr 12, 2024
7 checks passed
@leekelleher leekelleher deleted the feature/document-blueprint-folders branch April 12, 2024 14:00
@leekelleher leekelleher changed the title Feature/document blueprint folders Feature: Document Blueprint Folders Apr 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@leekelleher leekelleher leekelleher approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@loivsen @leekelleher