Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade escodegen to version 1.11.1 #13

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 20, 2019

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Feb 20, 2019

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ escodegen (1.11.0 → 1.11.1) · Repo

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Feb 20, 2019
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling ab41b6b on depfu/update/npm/escodegen-1.11.1 into 977fc00 on master.

@papandreou papandreou merged commit 3c1e7a8 into master Feb 20, 2019
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/npm/escodegen-1.11.1 branch February 20, 2019 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants