Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow custom KraftCloud server URI #1206

Open
marcrittinghaus opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Allow custom KraftCloud server URI #1206

marcrittinghaus opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/enhancement New feature or request priority/medium Issue which is important, but KraftKit is usable without it also.

Comments

@marcrittinghaus
Copy link
Member

Feature request summary

For local Kraftcloud development and on-premise deployments you need to be able to specify a local address (e.g., http://127.0.0.1:PORT or http://company-server.internal:PORT).

Suggestion is to add a KRAFTCLOUD_ADDR environment variable to the existing KRAFTCLOUD_METRO and KRAFTCLOUD_TOKEN variables. KRAFTCLOUD_ADDR takes precedence over KRAFTCLOUD_METRO and is used as-is if defined.

Describe alternatives

No response

Related architectures

None

Related platforms

None

Additional context

No response

@marcrittinghaus marcrittinghaus added the kind/enhancement New feature or request label Jan 30, 2024
@craciunoiuc craciunoiuc added the priority/medium Issue which is important, but KraftKit is usable without it also. label Feb 29, 2024
@allenkting
Copy link

Hello! I am a Computer Science student at the University of Texas at Austin. I am currently taking virtualization (CS 360v), and my partner and I would like contribute to this project. We would be interested in being assigned to work on this issue if it is still open!

@melars74
Copy link

Hi, I'm allenkting's partner for this project. Is this issue still open?

@craciunoiuc craciunoiuc self-assigned this Jun 17, 2024
@craciunoiuc
Copy link
Member

craciunoiuc commented Jun 17, 2024

Sorry guys, didn't see your comments, this Issue is mainly internal, and not up for grabs :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement New feature or request priority/medium Issue which is important, but KraftKit is usable without it also.
Projects
Status: Ready
Status: 🧊 Icebox
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants