Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update unpartial to the latest version 馃殌 #54

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 18, 2019

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Feb 18, 2019

The dependency unpartial was updated from 0.4.1 to 0.5.0.

This version is not covered by your current version range.

If you don鈥檛 accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.


Release Notes for v0.5.0

0.5.0 (2019-02-18)

Features

Commits

The new version differs by 8 commits.

  • 3249274 feat: add required (#22)
  • 691d92b chore: update project (#21)
  • bca5553 Update tslint-config-unional to the latest version 馃殌 (#19)
  • 39c3f44 chore(package): update tslint-config-unional to version 0.9.1 (#17)
  • 5811a0f chore(package): update ava to version 0.25.0 (#16)
  • 4101b11 chore(package): update dependency-check to version 3.0.0 (#15)
  • 99f7a1f chore(package): update ava to version 0.24.0 (#13)
  • 7f4e613 Fix travis

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don鈥檛 help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 馃尨

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 7c4bb63 on greenkeeper/unpartial-0.5.0 into b909ebd on master.

@unional unional merged commit 3fe9216 into master Feb 18, 2019
@unional unional deleted the greenkeeper/unpartial-0.5.0 branch February 18, 2019 02:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants