-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEATURE] NATS Message broker #1607
Comments
Do you know how NATS compares to Redpanda in terms of resource usage ? |
hey @Scarjit I have run Redpanda and kafka and nats jetstream. Before either existed ran tibco rendezvous :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4BnJ5QLeTY is a good comparison between kafka and nats that goes into the type of detail you might care about.... You asked about Resource usage but that is not the way to look at it. The trade offs are far more cross cutting: NATS is
|
Thank you for the suggestion! At the moment, we will stick with MQTT and Kafka. We need an MQTT in any case, as MQTT is very common in IoT and on the shopfloor. For stream processing, we leverage additionally Kafka (see also our reasoning here: https://learn.umh.app/blog/tools-techniques-for-scalable-data-processing-in-industrial-iot/) |
all good :) wil close... |
read that article. YOu know NATS has Leaf mode, which is for IOT factories etc where a network partition does not stop everything. |
@gedw99 We are currently in the process of restructuring our datamodel. |
Nats is like Kafka but golang .
Has mqtt support
works great with benthos.
lower cou , easier to run and manage. No jvm etc.
Easy to upgrade on the fly using lane duck mode.
nsc for for security and integration
anyways if you think it’s a good idea let me know.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: