Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add transaction info to link #162

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 19, 2021
Merged

Conversation

phieronymus
Copy link
Collaborator

@phieronymus phieronymus added the Enhancement New feature or request label Oct 15, 2021
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 15, 2021

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 0.0% when pulling 0f9b694 on feature/pierreh/update-link-type into b18c588 on master.

@phieronymus phieronymus marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2021 05:27
@phieronymus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The coverage is still acting weirdly, please do not mind it. See #69.

@@ -117,6 +121,7 @@ export interface ConfigurationItem {
securityConfiguration: SecurityConfiguration;
subscriptionConfiguration: SubscriptionsConfiguration;
userTransactionsConfiguration?: UserTransactionsConfiguration;
widgetConfiguration?: WidgetConfiguration | null;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry for the confusion, but I went with checkoutConfiguration as the name here!

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh thanks! 🙂

@@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ export interface DescriptorProvidedConfiguration {
name: string;
phoneNumber: string;
}
export interface WidgetConfiguration {
ecEmail?: { enabled?: boolean | null } | null;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think none of these is nullable or optional

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot 🙂

@perrin4869
Copy link
Collaborator

@phieronymus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@perrin4869 Thanks for catching the issues 🙂 I was trying with the ticket values.

@perrin4869 perrin4869 self-requested a review October 19, 2021 06:13
@perrin4869 perrin4869 merged commit 2f14988 into master Oct 19, 2021
@perrin4869 perrin4869 deleted the feature/pierreh/update-link-type branch October 19, 2021 06:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants