-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(action): show CI url in pullrequest body #1737
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Olblak <me@olblak.com>
Signed-off-by: Olblak <me@olblak.com>
Signed-off-by: Olblak <me@olblak.com>
Signed-off-by: Olblak <me@olblak.com>
Signed-off-by: Olblak <me@olblak.com>
Signed-off-by: Olblak <me@olblak.com>
Signed-off-by: Olblak <me@olblak.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I've added a few nitpicks, you're free to select them or not.
The last one (duplication of variables) is NOT a blocker. IF you want me to send a PR,n that will be a good exercise for me to put my hand dirty in updatecli
again (haven't done it since a long time)
Co-authored-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
I wonder if the Eventually, it could be under the experimental flag (e.g. enabled by default if WDYT @olblak ? |
For me In long term I think having this opt-out by default would be better so I don't think the experimental flag is needed here as we don't the current behavior |
I'm personally in favor of setting it to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving, whatever default is chosen
I was taking a more defensive approach, even thought I would also prefer to display the url by default I am going to change the setting |
Signed-off-by: Olblak <me@olblak.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯 Thanks so much!!!
Fix #1717
Test
Well I don't see how to test this feature without taking the risk of conflicting with the GitHub Action environment used to test Updatecli so I am just doing manual testing at this stage.
We must use an Updatecli that need to change something
Please note
<a href="https://github.com/foo/bar/actions/runs/1658821493">GitHub Action pipeline link</a>
in the console outputConsole Output
This pullrequest introduces in a new action setting
pipelineurl
such asAdditional Information
Tradeoff
Potential improvement