Images look like a mixed up grid with the scale option #303

folkshot · 2023-05-09T20:03:49Z

Checklist

I have checked that this issue isn't addressed in the FAQ.
I have checked that this issue isn't addressed in any other issue or pull request.

Describe the Bug

I select an image to upscayl, select digital art. (this issue happens with both jpg and png). The output image completely scrambles the original image. This just started a few minutes ago after the system forced an update to 2.5.1.

Logs

⚙️ Getting saveImageAs from localStorage png ⚙️ Getting model from localStorage {"label":"Digital Art","value":"realesrgan-x4plus-anime"} ⚙️ Setting gpuId to empty string 🔀 Setting model to 🔄 Resetting image paths 🔀 Setting model to realesrgan-x4plus-anime ⚙️ Getting saveImageAs from localStorage png ⚙️ Getting model from localStorage {"label":"Digital Art","value":"realesrgan-x4plus-anime"} ⚙️ Setting gpuId to empty string ⚙️ Getting rememberOutputFolder from localStorage false ⚙️ Getting saveImageAs from localStorage png ⚙️ Getting model from localStorage {"label":"Digital Art","value":"realesrgan-x4plus-anime"} ⚙️ Setting gpuId to empty string 🔀 Setting model to 🔀 Setting model to realesrgan-x4plus-anime 🔄 Resetting image paths 🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: 📄 Selected File Path: C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e.png 🖼 Selected Image Path: C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e.png 📁 Selected Image Directory: C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit 🖼 imagePath: C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e.png 🔤 Extension: png 🔄 Resetting Upscaled Image Path 🏁 UPSCAYL 🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: 📢 Upscayl Command: -i,C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e.png,-o,C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e_upscayl_2x_realesrgan-x4plus-anime.png,-s,2,-m,C:\Program Files\Upscayl\resources\models,-n,realesrgan-x4plus-anime,,-f,png 🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: [0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] queueC=2[8] queueG=0[16] queueT=1[2] [0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] bugsbn1=0 bugbilz=0 bugcopc=0 bugihfa=0 [0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] fp16-p/s/a=1/1/0 int8-p/s/a=1/1/1 [0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] subgroup=32 basic=1 vote=1 ballot=1 shuffle=1

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: [0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] queueC=2[8] queueG=0[16] queueT=1[2]
[0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] bugsbn1=0 bugbilz=0 bugcopc=0 bugihfa=0
[0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] fp16-p/s/a=1/1/0 int8-p/s/a=1/1/1
[0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] subgroup=32 basic=1 vote=1 ballot=1 shuffle=1

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: [1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] queueC=0[1] queueG=0[1] queueT=0[1]
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] bugsbn1=0 bugbilz=0 bugcopc=0 bugihfa=0
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] fp16-p/s/a=1/1/0 int8-p/s/a=1/0/0
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] subgroup=32 basic=1 vote=1 ballot=1 shuffle=1

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: [1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] queueC=0[1] queueG=0[1] queueT=0[1]
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] bugsbn1=0 bugbilz=0 bugcopc=0 bugihfa=0
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] fp16-p/s/a=1/1/0 int8-p/s/a=1/0/0
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] subgroup=32 basic=1 vote=1 ballot=1 shuffle=1

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 0.00%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 0.00%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 2.78%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 2.78%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 5.56%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 5.56%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 8.33%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 8.33%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 11.11%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 11.11%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 13.89%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 13.89%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 16.67%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 16.67%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 19.44%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 19.44%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 22.22%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 22.22%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 25.00%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 25.00%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 27.78%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 27.78%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 30.56%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 30.56%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 33.33%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 33.33%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 36.11%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 36.11%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 38.89%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 38.89%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 41.67%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 41.67%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 44.44%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 44.44%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 47.22%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 47.22%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 50.00%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 50.00%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 52.78%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 52.78%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 55.56%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 55.56%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 58.33%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 58.33%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 61.11%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 61.11%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 63.89%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 63.89%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 66.67%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 66.67%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 69.44%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 69.44%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 72.22%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 72.22%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 75.00%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 75.00%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 77.78%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 77.78%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 80.56%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 80.56%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 83.33%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 83.33%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 86.11%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 86.11%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 88.89%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 88.89%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 91.67%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 91.67%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 94.44%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 94.44%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 97.22%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 97.22%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: 💯 Done upscaling
upscaledImagePath:
💯 UPSCAYL_DONE: C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e_upscayl_2x_realesrgan-x4plus-anime.png
⚙️ Getting saveImageAs from localStorage png
⚙️ Getting model from localStorage {"label":"Digital Art","value":"realesrgan-x4plus-anime"}
⚙️ Setting gpuId to empty string
⚙️ Getting rememberOutputFolder from localStorage false
⚙️ Getting saveImageAs from localStorage jpg
⚙️ Getting model from localStorage {"label":"Digital Art","value":"realesrgan-x4plus-anime"}
⚙️ Setting gpuId to empty string
🔀 Setting model to
🔀 Setting model to realesrgan-x4plus-anime
🔄 Resetting image paths
🔄 Resetting image paths
🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: 📄 Selected File Path: C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e.png
🖼 Selected Image Path: C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e.png
📁 Selected Image Directory: C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit
🖼 imagePath: C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e.png
🔤 Extension: png
🔄 Resetting Upscaled Image Path
🏁 UPSCAYL
🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: 📢 Upscayl Command: -i,C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e.png,-o,C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e_upscayl_2x_realesrgan-x4plus-anime.jpg,-s,2,-m,C:\Program Files\Upscayl\resources\models,-n,realesrgan-x4plus-anime,,-f,jpg
🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: [0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] queueC=2[8] queueG=0[16] queueT=1[2]
[0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] bugsbn1=0 bugbilz=0 bugcopc=0 bugihfa=0
[0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] fp16-p/s/a=1/1/0 int8-p/s/a=1/1/1
[0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] subgroup=32 basic=1 vote=1 ballot=1 shuffle=1

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: [0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] queueC=2[8] queueG=0[16] queueT=1[2]
[0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] bugsbn1=0 bugbilz=0 bugcopc=0 bugihfa=0
[0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] fp16-p/s/a=1/1/0 int8-p/s/a=1/1/1
[0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060] subgroup=32 basic=1 vote=1 ballot=1 shuffle=1

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: [1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] queueC=0[1] queueG=0[1] queueT=0[1]
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] bugsbn1=0 bugbilz=0 bugcopc=0 bugihfa=0
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] fp16-p/s/a=1/1/0 int8-p/s/a=1/0/0
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] subgroup=32 basic=1 vote=1 ballot=1 shuffle=1

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: [1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] queueC=0[1] queueG=0[1] queueT=0[1]
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] bugsbn1=0 bugbilz=0 bugcopc=0 bugihfa=0
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] fp16-p/s/a=1/1/0 int8-p/s/a=1/0/0
[1 Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630] subgroup=32 basic=1 vote=1 ballot=1 shuffle=1

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 0.00%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 0.00%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 2.78%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 2.78%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 5.56%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 5.56%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 8.33%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 8.33%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 11.11%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 11.11%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 13.89%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 13.89%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 16.67%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 16.67%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 19.44%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 19.44%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 22.22%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 22.22%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 25.00%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 25.00%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 27.78%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 27.78%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 30.56%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 30.56%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 33.33%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 33.33%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 36.11%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 36.11%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 38.89%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 38.89%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 41.67%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 41.67%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 44.44%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 44.44%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 47.22%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 47.22%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 50.00%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 50.00%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 52.78%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 52.78%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 55.56%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 55.56%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 58.33%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 58.33%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 61.11%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 61.11%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 63.89%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 63.89%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 66.67%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 66.67%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 69.44%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 69.44%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 72.22%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 72.22%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 75.00%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 75.00%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 77.78%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 77.78%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 80.56%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 80.56%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 83.33%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 83.33%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 86.11%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 86.11%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 88.89%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 88.89%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 91.67%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 91.67%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 94.44%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 94.44%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: image upscayl: 97.22%

🚧 UPSCAYL_PROGRESS: 97.22%

🐞 BACKEND REPORTED: 💯 Done upscaling
upscaledImagePath:
💯 UPSCAYL_DONE: C:\Users\galag\Desktop\AI edit\AerodynamicA_vector_style_cartoon_a_large_red_alien_monster_spa_3b74b964-d672-4e17-be06-8ff66f68479e_upscayl_2x_realesrgan-x4plus-anime.jpg
⚙️ Getting saveImageAs from localStorage jpg
⚙️ Getting model from localStorage {"label":"Digital Art","value":"realesrgan-x4plus-anime"}
⚙️ Setting gpuId to empty string
⚙️ Getting rememberOutputFolder from localStorage false

To Reproduce

I select an image to upscayl, select digital art. (this issue happens with both jpg and png). Select the Upscayl button. Wait for it to process. The output image completely scrambles the original image.

Expected Behavior

an upscayl replica of the original image.

Version/Commit Hash

2.5.1

OS Specifics

Win10

Screenshots

NayamAmarshe · 2023-05-09T20:20:02Z

Well, that's why the scale option is labeled experimental 😅

This might be of use to you though: https://github.com/upscayl/custom-models

aaronliu0130 · 2023-05-09T20:25:27Z

I don't think the fact that this is experimental means that this isn't a bug.

NayamAmarshe · 2023-05-09T20:35:22Z

I don't think the fact that this is experimental means that this isn't a bug.

It's not a bug. The models are made for x4, to use other scales you have to use a compatible model (as mentioned in the custom models repository).

folkshot · 2023-05-09T20:35:36Z

I thought the 2x scale was what is had been originally. When I placed it back up to the 4x scale, it worked great. Thanks.

aaronliu0130 · 2023-05-09T20:36:36Z

I mean even though the models are made for x4, we should either fix that or use a different way, like downscaling the output

NayamAmarshe · 2023-05-09T20:40:13Z

I mean even though the models are made for x4, we should either fix that or use a different way, like downscaling the output

That would be for some future version.

Updated the wiki:
https://github.com/upscayl/upscayl/wiki/Guide#scale-option

aaronliu0130 · 2023-05-14T12:43:32Z

Reopening as this is still planned for some future version.

PhobosK · 2023-06-04T02:32:27Z

Well, that's why the scale option is labeled experimental 😅

This might be of use to you though: https://github.com/upscayl/custom-models

In my 15+ years of experience as a user and as a developer of OSS (with usage even of alfa versions apps), I've never encountered an application where "Experimental" meant a 100% fail result 😄 .... Usually it means -> it may work in certain/most cases but it may not work in others and thus the feature is labeled as "experimental" until all cases are sorted out....

IMHO, in this particular case while this is sorted out in the future version, it would be a good practise the user to be at least warned with some kind of a warning box (if he chooses a 3X, 2X image scale), that he will get a garbage result if the selected "Upscaling type" is not supporting the scale... Sorry but I do not think anyone reads a Wiki that often, maybe until he gets the garbage result..
It will be best of course, if there is an internal check of the supported by the rescale method scales, and when the user selects 3X, the app to list only the supported rescale types...
Anyway there is no way for the user to know by looking to the listed in app scale methods if the method supports the scale or not...

Anyway, thanks for the great work and efforts done with this app guys...
Lovely job

NayamAmarshe · 2023-06-04T02:59:54Z

Well, that's why the scale option is labeled experimental 😅

This might be of use to you though: https://github.com/upscayl/custom-models

In my 15+ years of experience as a user and as a developer of OSS (with usage even of alfa versions apps), I've never encountered an application where "Experimental" meant a 100% fail result 😄 .... Usually it means -> it may work in certain/most cases but it may not work in others and thus the feature is labeled as "experimental" until all cases are sorted out....

IMHO, in this particular case while this is sorted out in the future version, it would be a good practise the user to be at least warned with some kind of a warning box (if he chooses a 3X, 2X image scale), that he will get a garbage result if the selected "Upscaling type" is not supporting the scale... Sorry but I do not think anyone reads a Wiki that often, maybe until he gets the garbage result..
It will be best of course, if there is an internal check of the supported by the rescale method scales, and when the user selects 3X, the app to list only the supported rescale types...
Anyway there is no way for the user to know by looking to the listed in app scale methods if the method supports the scale or not...

Anyway, thanks for the great work and efforts done with this app guys...
Lovely job

Experimental label is there because it only works with certain models, not all of them, definitely not the default ones. So it definitely works, just not the way a user would think it should work.

The new version already has warnings and links to wiki, so that's sorted :)

PhobosK · 2023-06-04T04:12:27Z

That's great !

Thanks a lot :)

Keep up the great work and your great attitude to users ;)

deepnx · 2023-06-27T13:08:19Z

Well, that's why the scale option is labeled experimental 😅
This might be of use to you though: https://github.com/upscayl/custom-models

In my 15+ years of experience as a user and as a developer of OSS (with usage even of alfa versions apps), I've never encountered an application where "Experimental" meant a 100% fail result 😄 .... Usually it means -> it may work in certain/most cases but it may not work in others and thus the feature is labeled as "experimental" until all cases are sorted out....
IMHO, in this particular case while this is sorted out in the future version, it would be a good practise the user to be at least warned with some kind of a warning box (if he chooses a 3X, 2X image scale), that he will get a garbage result if the selected "Upscaling type" is not supporting the scale... Sorry but I do not think anyone reads a Wiki that often, maybe until he gets the garbage result..
It will be best of course, if there is an internal check of the supported by the rescale method scales, and when the user selects 3X, the app to list only the supported rescale types...
Anyway there is no way for the user to know by looking to the listed in app scale methods if the method supports the scale or not...
Anyway, thanks for the great work and efforts done with this app guys...
Lovely job

Experimental label is there because it only works with certain models, not all of them, definitely not the default ones. So it definitely works, just not the way a user would think it should work.

The new version already has warnings and links to wiki, so that's sorted :)

Hi,

I get the boxes regardless of any option, Even after a fresh install with not changing any settings, Just basic Ultramix or Real option. i get such boxes.

How can I get the simple working upscaly back? there is no option to turn off scale in settings either.

aaronliu0130 · 2023-06-27T16:41:00Z

Drag the scale slider completely to the right.

martikyan · 2023-07-15T12:04:45Z

I think this issue is somehow related to the invalid resolution. The resolution doesn't change if the experimental image slider is moved.

aaronliu0130 · 2023-07-16T04:10:27Z

I'm not sure what you mean by "invalid resolution".

martikyan · 2023-07-16T14:52:07Z

I'm not sure what you mean by "invalid resolution".

As you can see the target resolution is not the double of the original resolution, even though the image scale is set to 2x.

aaronliu0130 · 2023-07-16T16:18:25Z

Are you sure that's not just a display error and the output file is that resolution?

martikyan · 2023-07-16T16:54:07Z

Are you sure that's not just a display error and the output file is that resolution?

Just checked. That's a UI bug. Perhaps the invalid resolution is being taken from UI and used in calculations? Is that possible?

aaronliu0130 · 2023-07-17T00:16:40Z

Probably not. Plus we already have another reason (the tiling) for why this happens.

aaronliu0130 · 2023-08-29T21:26:34Z

Note that this can also be due to not selecting the appropriate scale for a model, which in some cases like x1 is impossible. This has the same cause as this issue.

folkshot added the bug Something isn't working label May 9, 2023

NayamAmarshe closed this as completed May 9, 2023

aaronliu0130 reopened this May 9, 2023

folkshot closed this as completed May 9, 2023

This was referenced May 10, 2023

Dont work anymore after 2.5.1 update #307

Closed

The photo after processing is displayed incorrectly #309

Closed

aaronliu0130 mentioned this issue May 11, 2023

Upscaling creates a broken image #312

Closed

2 tasks

This was referenced May 12, 2023

output is tiled #313

Closed

Bath Processing On Windows Results In mosaic #321

Closed

aaronliu0130 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 14, 2023

aaronliu0130 reopened this May 14, 2023

aaronliu0130 mentioned this issue May 14, 2023

2x and 3x scaling issues #322

Closed

2 tasks

aaronliu0130 changed the title ~~output has my images looking like a mixed up grid~~ Images look like a mixed up grid with the scale option Jun 5, 2023

NayamAmarshe mentioned this issue Jun 9, 2023

The resulting image becomes a square box #349

Closed

2 tasks

aaronliu0130 mentioned this issue Jul 7, 2023

UPSCAYL BLOCKING AFTER UPSCAYLING #389

Closed

3 tasks

This was referenced Aug 10, 2023

At 3x or 2x, the picture will tear. #411

Closed

UX/UI enhancement #414

Closed

This was referenced Aug 17, 2023

upscaled pictures cannot be saved, shown as black #354

Closed

Result Error #424

Closed

aaronliu0130 mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2023

Scale resolution display is wrong #433

Closed

3 tasks

NayamAmarshe closed this as completed Sep 1, 2023

aaronliu0130 added this to the v2.6 milestone Sep 1, 2023

aaronliu0130 mentioned this issue Nov 5, 2023

Allow selection of lower image scaling (2x, for example) while not post-processing image #557

Closed

2 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Images look like a mixed up grid with the scale option #303

Images look like a mixed up grid with the scale option #303

folkshot commented May 9, 2023 •

edited by aaronliu0130

NayamAmarshe commented May 9, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented May 9, 2023

NayamAmarshe commented May 9, 2023

folkshot commented May 9, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented May 9, 2023

NayamAmarshe commented May 9, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented May 14, 2023

PhobosK commented Jun 4, 2023

NayamAmarshe commented Jun 4, 2023

PhobosK commented Jun 4, 2023

deepnx commented Jun 27, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented Jun 27, 2023

martikyan commented Jul 15, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented Jul 16, 2023

martikyan commented Jul 16, 2023 •

edited

aaronliu0130 commented Jul 16, 2023

martikyan commented Jul 16, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented Jul 17, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented Aug 29, 2023 •

edited

Images look like a mixed up grid with the scale option #303

Images look like a mixed up grid with the scale option #303

Comments

folkshot commented May 9, 2023 • edited by aaronliu0130

Checklist

Describe the Bug

To Reproduce

Expected Behavior

Version/Commit Hash

OS Specifics

Screenshots

NayamAmarshe commented May 9, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented May 9, 2023

NayamAmarshe commented May 9, 2023

folkshot commented May 9, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented May 9, 2023

NayamAmarshe commented May 9, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented May 14, 2023

PhobosK commented Jun 4, 2023

NayamAmarshe commented Jun 4, 2023

PhobosK commented Jun 4, 2023

deepnx commented Jun 27, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented Jun 27, 2023

martikyan commented Jul 15, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented Jul 16, 2023

martikyan commented Jul 16, 2023 • edited

aaronliu0130 commented Jul 16, 2023

martikyan commented Jul 16, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented Jul 17, 2023

aaronliu0130 commented Aug 29, 2023 • edited

folkshot commented May 9, 2023 •

edited by aaronliu0130

martikyan commented Jul 16, 2023 •

edited

aaronliu0130 commented Aug 29, 2023 •

edited