Still cleaning things up #36
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… convince someone to delete all of the headers from f/. this is, of course, unadvised.
johncburnham
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2013
Still cleaning things up
|
Most of the old stuff lives at https://github.com/cgyarvin/urbit. I think for people who want to go all digital archeologist, that's the place to look. Everything here should be as slick as possible. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
And justifying the existence of a file. The goal of all my work the past day or so is to make what documentation DOES exist in the repo a little bit useful, and to get out of sight the ones that will lead you down the wrong rabbit hole. There's plenty of good stuff that's been deleted that could help with a partial understanding of Urbit, but a fragmented one. Those who want to explore that can dig in to past commits.
Along that vein it might be worth tagging a commit before 9/26, for before a lot of other hands started jumping in?