Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix typo #493

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 12, 2022
Merged

fix typo #493

merged 1 commit into from Jul 12, 2022

Conversation

doctorcolossus
Copy link
Contributor

"will be have" → "will have"

Checklist
  • I've ensured that similar functionality has not already been implemented
  • [n/a] I've ensured that similar functionality has not earlier been proposed and declined
  • I've branched off the master or python-dual-support branch
  • I've merged fresh upstream into my branch recently
  • [n/a] I've ran tox successfully in local environment
  • [n/a] I've included docstrings and/or documentation and/or examples for my code (if this is a new feature)
Description:

(P. S. If this pull requests fixes an existing issue, please specify which one.)

"will be have" → "will have"
@ulidtko ulidtko merged commit 58f16c7 into urwid:master Jul 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants