Feature/storage api

[Stalkakuma]

...
(stand in for commits I did not address, yet)
...

Packages added:

1. jest-localstorage-mock -- added for Jest testing with Storage API.
2. Updated Storybook packages from 6.4.21 to 6.4.22

Done:

1. Two separate returns for the consent hook, returning either Cookies actions or if Storage API is passed as an argument -- storage actions.
2. Three Separate storybook stories, to test out storage in a working environment.
3. One extra Jest test using local storage.

TODO:

1. Write the rest of the tests.
2. Clean up code.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #28 (e926b62) into main (d95974f) will increase coverage by 0.85%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #28      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.00%   92.85%   +0.85%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines          50       56       +6     
  Branches       17       22       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits           46       52       +6     
  Misses          3        3              
  Partials        1        1              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/constants.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/useCookieConsent.ts	90.90% <100.00%> (+1.43%)	⬆️
src/utils.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d95974f...e926b62. Read the comment docs.

[bring-shrubbery]

@Stalkakuma Another common thing people do is add a description in the PR, pointing to the ticket and explaining what changed. It's not required here, but would be nice as a practice. And you can do stuff like include "Closes !" text to automatically close the ticket after this PR is merged.

[bring-shrubbery]

Added some comments. Just a note on tests when you add them: the basic tests for the storage should essentially be the same as existing ones, but just use different storage; maybe it's even worth using the same tests, and iterate over them several times for different storage options.

[bring-shrubbery]

Nice, I think we should merge Cypress tests first and then we can wrap up with this one!