Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add System Flag or Prop to Catalog Parameter Guidelines #1411

Open
3 tasks
aj-stein-nist opened this issue Aug 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Open
3 tasks

Add System Flag or Prop to Catalog Parameter Guidelines #1411

aj-stein-nist opened this issue Aug 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
Aged A label for issues older than 2023-01-01 Discussion Needed This issues needs to be reviewed by the OSCAL development team. enhancement Research Scope: Modeling Issues targeted at development of OSCAL formats User Story

Comments

@aj-stein-nist
Copy link
Contributor

aj-stein-nist commented Aug 12, 2022

User Story

As an OSCAL tool developer or content consumer, I need a method to identify what organization defined a given parameter guideline. I would like a method to properly track what organization creates or maintains a given parameter guideline.

Goals

Address feedback, design a solution, and implement accordingly given PR feedback in david-waltermire#52 (comment). (NOTE: This is a replacement issue for david-waltermire#54 because GitHub doesn't allow transfering from personal owner to org owner repo.)

Dependencies

No response

Acceptance Criteria

  • All OSCAL website and readme documentation affected by the changes in this issue have been updated. Changes to the OSCAL website can be made in the docs/content directory of your branch.
  • A Pull Request (PR) is submitted that fully addresses the goals of this User Story. This issue is referenced in the PR.
  • The CI-CD build process runs without any reported errors on the PR. This can be confirmed by reviewing that all checks have passed in the PR.
@aj-stein-nist aj-stein-nist added enhancement User Story Discussion Needed This issues needs to be reviewed by the OSCAL development team. Scope: Modeling Issues targeted at development of OSCAL formats labels Aug 12, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to Needs Triage in Issue Triage Aug 12, 2022
@david-waltermire david-waltermire moved this from Needs Triage to Needs Discussion in Issue Triage Aug 16, 2022
@david-waltermire david-waltermire added the Model Engineering An issue to be discussed during the bi-weekly Model Engineering Meeting label Aug 16, 2022
@GaryGapinski
Copy link

GaryGapinski commented Apr 6, 2023

Is it safe to presume that this issue is prompted in part by the {0,∞} cardinality of guidance?

One might desire the same declaration of provenance for constraint {0,∞}.

As of the current (1.0.4) schema guideline has blockElementGroup content, which precludes prop and has no element which could be coaxed into a declaration of provenance. However, param itself has elements which could be used to denote provenance (prop, link).

This appears to tacitly acknowledge the possibility of multiple origins of guidance (if so, profile resolution gets more complex).

@aj-stein-nist aj-stein-nist moved this from Needs Discussion to Allocated to Milestone in Issue Triage Apr 6, 2023
@aj-stein-nist aj-stein-nist removed the Model Engineering An issue to be discussed during the bi-weekly Model Engineering Meeting label Jul 11, 2023
@aj-stein-nist aj-stein-nist removed this from Allocated to Milestone in Issue Triage Sep 20, 2023
@Arminta-Jenkins-NIST
Copy link
Contributor

At 10/12 Triage Meeting: Team agrees that this issue needs to be marked as DEFINE.

@Compton-US Compton-US added the Aged A label for issues older than 2023-01-01 label Nov 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Aged A label for issues older than 2023-01-01 Discussion Needed This issues needs to be reviewed by the OSCAL development team. enhancement Research Scope: Modeling Issues targeted at development of OSCAL formats User Story
Projects
Status: DEFINE Research Needed
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants