You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recently, when I tried to extract one of the events from the metadata (sqlite database), I found that the time series in the event was downsampled by almost a factor of 30. I have 15000 samples for the same event in my signal, but the extract from metadata has only 499 samples. The shape of the event's waveform is preserved. Both of them look exactly the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I can't seem to reproduce this. Below are screenshots of two representative events. The blue trace is the raw data and the orange is from the database. They seem to overlap perfectly with no evidence of downsampling. Could you post similar screenshots of what you observe?
Now, I am also getting the same number of samples from metadata's time series, when I directly extracted. But previously, the events were extracted from mosaic_plot/mosaicAnalysis/analysisTimeSeries.py, which also uses the same sqlite database.
Recently, when I tried to extract one of the events from the metadata (sqlite database), I found that the time series in the event was downsampled by almost a factor of 30. I have 15000 samples for the same event in my signal, but the extract from metadata has only 499 samples. The shape of the event's waveform is preserved. Both of them look exactly the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: