Numeric fields and date update #3392
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
USWDS-3350: Provide updated guidance for numeric fields.
|
@jaredcunha and @Ben-Judy-Flexion I haven't changed any of your work, just merging it into |
|
@thisisdano Looks good to me |
jaredcunha
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2020
wbyoko
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Improved mobile experience for numeric fields. We updated our guidance and code for numeric fields to follow the lead of gov.uk's recent guidance and research. This updates those fields to use
textrather thannumberinputs with aninputmodeofnumeric.Documentation →