You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After commit 37f4060225df0591ab8e1dd676dbc8115d900d4f, exFAT filesystem is not probed by blkid.
commit 37f4060225df0591ab8e1dd676dbc8115d900d4f
Author: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date: Thu Mar 20 11:03:50 2014 +0100
blkid: convert superblocks to new calling convention
With the previous patch the scanning functions were
modified to return a differentiated return code.
To correctly abort scanning when an I/O error occurs
we need to differentiate between 'error' (= -1) and
'not found' (= 1) in the probe functions.
This patch updates all superblock scanning functions
to the new calling convention.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
When I revert some code, it probes exFAT disk properly like:
Since 37f4060 prober functions are
sensitive to errno, it seems more robust to set errno=0 with in
blkid_probe_get_buffer() on success than set the zero on all places
where we call blkid_probe_get_buffer().
Addresses: #119
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Since 37f4060 prober functions are
sensitive to errno, it seems more robust to set errno=0 with in
blkid_probe_get_buffer() on success than set the zero on all places
where we call blkid_probe_get_buffer().
Addresses: #119
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
After commit
37f4060225df0591ab8e1dd676dbc8115d900d4f
, exFAT filesystem is not probed by blkid.When I revert some code, it probes exFAT disk properly like:
Following is my patch.
I don't know that this is a correct patch, but it works.
Any suggestion or idea?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: