Describing secondary entities in a CONTENTdm 'record' #36
briesenberg07
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
If a registry goes on and continues to be used with CONTENTdm, it could be useful to consider whether any kind of general policy* could be identified here. A number of (actually, really quite a few) existing properties (including many created just for the SSDC MAP) serve this purpose (not an exhaustive list):
This is also related to questions of whether we are describing a digital surrogate or a physical resource from which a surrogate was created or both.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions