Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

molbit sequences #2

Closed
enovoa opened this issue Aug 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

molbit sequences #2

enovoa opened this issue Aug 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@enovoa
Copy link

enovoa commented Aug 3, 2020

Hello! Thanks for sharing your work in bioRxiv. I was wondering if you could make available the fasta sequences for all 96 molbit sequences after 31 iterations of the evolutionary model? I could find the fasta with the corresponding squiggles in Supp Figure 5, but a plain txt/csv file with the individual fasta sequences would be very useful. Where can I find this? Thanks so much, and congrats on the preprint! Eva

@kdoroschak
Copy link
Member

kdoroschak commented Aug 11, 2020

Hi Eva,

Thanks for reaching out! You can find the sequences here: https://github.com/uwmisl/Porcupine/blob/master/porcupine_sequences.fa Is this what you had in mind? We intend to include this as a supplementary file with the final publication as well, so it's easier to find.

Just want to note -- If you end up using any of these sequences for your RNA barcoding, I would recommend selecting those with read counts that hovered around the median (e.g. 11, 29, 37, 44, 67 as in Supp. Fig 8 in the preprint), due to the still-unexplained variation in read counts. That way no correction should be needed. (Only making this suggestion since we'd talked briefly about sequences at LC19. If you use these in any way, I would be curious to know how it goes!)

Best,
Katie

@kdoroschak kdoroschak added the question Further information is requested label Aug 11, 2020
@enovoa
Copy link
Author

enovoa commented Aug 11, 2020

Hi Katie,
Thank you very much! Yes, that's exactly what I was looking for :)
Yes, I agree would be useful to place them as supp File in the final publication, as I was unable to find them when looking for them.
Will definetely keep you guys posted on how it goes if we use them for RNA :) We will probably do a small trial first.
Thanks again!
Eva

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants