Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: workaround Polymer getProperty with mixins/observers #484

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 25, 2020

Conversation

tomivirkki
Copy link
Member

@tomivirkki tomivirkki force-pushed the workaround-polymer-getproperty branch from 696d543 to c0e9406 Compare June 22, 2020 09:13
Copy link
Member

@web-padawan web-padawan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🙈

@tomivirkki
Copy link
Member Author

The suggested fix no longer works with the latest Polymer version because _getProperty was inlined here

Changed the fix so that a getter/setter pair is defined for __data instead 😬🙈

Copy link
Member

@web-padawan web-padawan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@tomivirkki tomivirkki merged commit ccf8e8c into master Jun 25, 2020
@tomivirkki tomivirkki deleted the workaround-polymer-getproperty branch June 25, 2020 06:20
DiegoCardoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2020
See Polymer/polymer#5259

Co-authored-by: Tomi Virkki <tomivirkki@users.noreply.github.com>
DiegoCardoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2020
See Polymer/polymer#5259

Co-authored-by: Tomi Virkki <tomivirkki@users.noreply.github.com>
DiegoCardoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2020
See Polymer/polymer#5259

Co-authored-by: Tomi Virkki <tomivirkki@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Simple input sequence I18n error.
2 participants