Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix shape trimming to avoid single point edges #1876

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 12, 2019
Merged

Conversation

kevinkreiser
Copy link
Member

in some scenarios the partial shape trimming for the beginning and end of the route can lead to an edge with a single point, this causes many problems downstream for guidance and eventually on the client side as well. i'll annotate the PR with the series of things going on to address that in this PR.

src/thor/triplegbuilder.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/mapmatch.cc Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -30,45 +30,6 @@ using namespace valhalla::thor;

namespace {

template <class iter>
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this shape trimming code has the possibility for it to only add 1 shape point for a given edge which has downstream negative consequences. there is another shape trimming method below which doesnt not suffer this problem, so i've switched to using that

// We need to clip the shape if its at the beginning or end and is not full length
float total = static_cast<float>(directededge->length());
// Trim the shape
TrimShape(edge_shape, is_first_edge ? start_pct * total : 0,
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

here we use the other shape trimming method. if its the first edge of the route we want to trim the front of the shape starting at the start vertex otherwise we want the whole front. if its the last edge we want to trim the back of the shape up to the end vertex otherwise we want the whole back. i can split this into two ifs for clarity

auto walked_encoded_shape = walked.get<std::string>("shape");
auto walked_shape = midgard::decode<std::vector<midgard::PointLL>>(walked_encoded_shape);
/*if (walked_shape.size() != shape.size()) {
throw std::logic_error("Differing shape lengths " + std::to_string(shape.size()) +
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

once i had made the change to do the trimming properly, this test started failing with some wild numbers in terms of distance between points. so i eventually found out that when you take a route and you then edge_walk map match its shape, the shape that you get back has 1 more point in it. i added this code to determine that. even after reverting all my o ther changes but leaving this check, the code still breaks. so this commented code is another bug to fix unrelated to this pr about why the shape walk of a regular route has one more shape point.

else {
bx = bx * scale + u.first;
by = by * scale + u.second;
}
Copy link
Member Author

@kevinkreiser kevinkreiser Jul 12, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

while i was goose-chasing the oddity with map matching test failure i thought that maybe it had something to do with the difference in precision between lokis projection and meilis. so to remove that concern i refactored them to share the same code.

* where the point is long lived and we survey many many shape segments such as is done in
* both loki and in meili
* */
struct projector_t {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this was lifted directly out of loki and is now called from both meili and loki

@kevinkreiser kevinkreiser requested a review from danpaz July 12, 2019 13:07
Copy link
Member

@dgearhart dgearhart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No diffs with RAD testing - 🚢

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants