Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(onboarding): add terms and conditions colloquial variant #5293

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 22, 2024

Conversation

satish-ravi
Copy link
Contributor

@satish-ravi satish-ravi commented Apr 22, 2024

Description

Implements the colliquial terms variant for the terms and conditions experiment.

Test plan

Control Colloquial
iOS
ios-tc-control.mp4
ios-tc-colloquial.mp4
Android
android-tc-control.webm
android-tc-colloquial.webm

Related issues

Backwards compatibility

N/A

Network scalability

N/A

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.02%. Comparing base (87b9892) to head (dde248e).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5293   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.01%   86.02%           
=======================================
  Files         746      746           
  Lines       30520    30537   +17     
  Branches     5291     5294    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        26252    26268   +16     
- Misses       4036     4037    +1     
  Partials      232      232           
Files Coverage Δ
src/onboarding/registration/RegulatoryTerms.tsx 96.82% <100.00%> (+1.17%) ⬆️
src/statsig/constants.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/statsig/types.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 87b9892...dde248e. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@MuckT MuckT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Maybe we should change this to a functional component, but that's outside of the scope of the ticket.

@satish-ravi satish-ravi added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 22, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Apr 22, 2024
@satish-ravi satish-ravi added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 22, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Apr 22, 2024
@satish-ravi satish-ravi added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 22, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Apr 22, 2024
@satish-ravi satish-ravi added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 22, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 81d0924 Apr 22, 2024
17 checks passed
@satish-ravi satish-ravi deleted the satish/act-1162-2 branch April 22, 2024 23:56
shottah pushed a commit to zed-io/kolektivo that referenced this pull request May 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants