Netbox Synchronization failed:

[notscottsmith]

Context

• XO origin: the sources
  • xo-web 5.82.0
  • xo-server 5.79.5

Expected behavior

Successful synchronisation to a netbox instance

Current behavior

netbox.synchronize
{
  "pools": [
    "47a37b4a-cd5c-abb2-a2e4-7d2cb7f103e3"
  ]
}
{
  "message": "not a valid IPv4 or IPv6 address: 172.16.x.x 192.168.x.x",
  "name": "Error",
  "stack": "Error: not a valid IPv4 or IPv6 address: 172.16.x.x 192.168.x.x
    at /home/node/xen-orchestra/node_modules/is-in-subnet/src/index.ts:49:13
    at isInSubnet (/home/node/xen-orchestra/node_modules/is-in-subnet/src/index.ts:16:40)
    at find (/home/node/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server-netbox/src/index.js:496:58)
    at Array.find (<anonymous>)
    at Netbox.#synchronize (/home/node/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server-netbox/src/index.js:496:37)
    at Api.callApiMethod (file:///home/node/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/api.mjs:304:20)"
}

VM is configured with 2 IPs on a single interface

[olivierlambert]

That's a use case we didn't plan for :) Thanks for the report, we'll have to fix that.

[pdonias]

Having 2 IPs on a single interface shouldn't be an issue, but there, it looks like there are 2 IPs in the same IP field.

@notscottsmith I guess you obfuscated the IPs yourself? Can you confirm that there were actually 2 IPs as shown in the error message by running this on your server:

xe vm-list params=networks uuid=<VM UUID>

Thanks!

[notscottsmith]

Having 2 IPs on a single interface shouldn't be an issue, but there, it looks like there are 2 IPs in the same IP field.

@notscottsmith I guess you obfuscated the IPs yourself? Can you confirm that there were actually 2 IPs as shown in the error message by running this on your server:

xe vm-list params=networks uuid=<VM UUID>

Thanks!

Can definitely confirm it has two. From Xen-Orchestra:

From console:

We have several VMs which this issue would apply to and they all display this way.

[olivierlambert]

That seems to be the way old tools are displaying IPs. On recent tools, if you have multiple IPs on the same VIF, it will be, for example: 0/ipv4/1: 10.1.1.1; 0/ipv4/0: 192.168.1.1

Please use more recent tools in your guest, that might fix the situation. I don't know the difficulty to be compatible with old ones on our side.

[notscottsmith]

We have a mix of 7.6 and 8.x XCP servers but I'd put money on the tools not being updated.

[pdonias]

I don't know the difficulty to be compatible with old ones on our side.

It's an easy change, we already tried to be compatible but probably missed that space-delimited case.

@notscottsmith We'll handle it in XO but you may still want to update your guest tools to avoid any further issues :)