Feature request: Support for Astronomy

[RSchwan]

For my new project I use astronomy. I'm not sure how hard it is to add support for it or if it is even possible.
Next week I have some time available and would like to implement it.
The only thing is that I don't really know where to start. But I hope with some guidance it should be possible.

[serkandurusoy]

You can start from https://github.com/rclai/meteor-astronomy-simple-schema

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:56 PM, RSchwan notifications@github.com wrote:

For my new project I use astronomy
https://github.com/jagi/meteor-astronomy. I'm not sure how hard it is
to add support for it or if it is even possible.
Next week I have some time available and would like to implement it.
The only thing is that I don't really know where to start. But I hope with
some guidance it should be possible.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#44, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEbz3HCpOXarCXSJ2KJTPgYYYLNfZBSaks5qPChlgaJpZM4I-CFy
.

[radekmie]

To be honest, I've never been using astronomy personally, so I don't really know, what could be hard or problematic to implement.

I would also start with meteor-astronomy-simple-schema (you may take some notes from there).

Then those surely will be your reference: astronomy/fields and astronomy/validators.

Also, current SimpleSchema implementation could be very handy.

Every question is welcome (:

[radekmie]

Hey, @RSchwan. Any progress? Need some help?

[RSchwan]

It's harder than I thought. For first level fields I have something working (not 100% satisfied). But I have problems with nested fields and arrays.
Also I switched from Astronomy to SimpleSchema. So I'm not sure if I'm going to work on it anymore.

[radekmie]

How about sharing your code? You can create a PR, we mark it with help wanted - maybe someone will continue your work?

[radekmie]

Over three years and one mid-way PR later, it's still not finished. I'm closing due to a lack of interest. Feel free to comment or continue the PR.