Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Obfuscation observations #5

Open
rajeshca911 opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Obfuscation observations #5

rajeshca911 opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@rajeshca911
Copy link

Screenshot (1)
Hi , Thank you for your awesome tools
I noticed the following while obfuscating; if it's possible, update it.

Observation :1

If the function is nested as seen in the attached image, obfuscation is ignored.

Observation :2

If a variable with the name "obj" is declared, "objHttp" will also have some of its name obscured.
Example: 'Obj' = o001101 , 'ObjHttp' is being renamed as o001101HTTP

Observation :3

Obfuscation of sheetcode names (Module 100) is a problem.
The project explorer does not obfuscate the sheet codenames,but macrotools does. mismatch between these two throwing an error
instance, if I have a sheet codename "Sh1", the code name appears unaltered in project explorer, but the obfuscation procedure refers to it as "o011111001" and throws an error when I try to execute sheet commands like o011111001.activate, o011111001.unprotect. etc. because the code name doesn't match the obfuscated variable name

I apologise for being overly critical; whether you fix it or not is entirely up to you. However, I would like to request that you consider the points raised above in your next update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant