Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix failing the test of internal/backoff #468

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2020
Merged

Conversation

hlts2
Copy link
Contributor

@hlts2 hlts2 commented Jun 11, 2020

Signed-off-by: hlts2 hiroto.funakoshi.hiroto@gmail.com

Description:

I fixed failing the test of internal/backoff.

Related Issue:

How Has This Been Tested?:

Environment:

  • Go Version: 1.14.3
  • Docker Version: 19.03.8
  • Kubernetes Version: 1.18.2
  • NGT Version: 1.11.5

Types of changes:

  • Bug fix [type/bug]
  • New feature [type/feature]
  • Add tests [type/test]
  • Security related changes [type/security]
  • Add documents [type/documentation]
  • Refactoring [type/refactoring]
  • Update dependencies [type/dependency]
  • Update benchmarks and performances [type/bench]
  • Update CI [type/ci]

Changes to Core Features:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
  • Have you successfully ran tests with your changes locally?

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have checked open Pull Requests for the similar feature or fixes?
  • I have added tests and benchmarks to cover my changes.
  • I have ensured all new and existing tests passed.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Signed-off-by: hlts2 <hiroto.funakoshi.hiroto@gmail.com>
@hlts2 hlts2 requested a review from kevindiu June 11, 2020 02:44
@hlts2 hlts2 self-assigned this Jun 11, 2020
@pull-assistant
Copy link

Score: 1.00

Best reviewed: commit by commit


Optimal code review plan

     fix: failing test

Powered by Pull Assistant. Last update e85fc4a ... e85fc4a. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #468 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #468   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    7.89%   7.89%           
======================================
  Files         392     392           
  Lines       20039   20039           
======================================
  Hits         1582    1582           
  Misses      18222   18222           
  Partials      235     235           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dc8cf39...e85fc4a. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@kevindiu kevindiu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hlts2 hlts2 requested a review from vankichi June 11, 2020 05:28
@vankichi
Copy link
Contributor

/rebase

@vdaas-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

[REBASE] Rebase triggered by vankichi for branch: test/internal/backoff

Copy link
Contributor

@vankichi vankichi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vankichi
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Copy link
Collaborator

@vdaas-ci vdaas-ci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[APPROVED] This PR is approved by vankichi.

@vankichi vankichi merged commit 5257496 into master Jun 11, 2020
@vankichi vankichi deleted the test/internal/backoff branch June 11, 2020 05:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants