Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature-request: interactive zoom #168

Closed
jaredly opened this issue Jan 3, 2014 · 8 comments
Closed

feature-request: interactive zoom #168

jaredly opened this issue Jan 3, 2014 · 8 comments
Labels
feature-request For requesting new features or transforms

Comments

@jaredly
Copy link

jaredly commented Jan 3, 2014

Would be awesome, and I don't imagine it would be super difficult (especially in svg). I might work on a patch

@milimetric
Copy link

I've done this a couple of times for libraries I've built on top of d3. Please keep me in the loop, I'd like to help as well. I can maybe improve your patch.

@jaredly
Copy link
Author

jaredly commented Feb 25, 2014

@milimetric unfortunately it looks like vega isn't actively maintained :( I've been thinking of creating a fork or just creating my own project to

  • use CommonJS module system (probably browserify)
  • fully unittest it (currently very minimal tests)
  • have a separate repo for the "playground"
  • allow rich interactivity, not just highlight-on-hover

I think this project has tons of potential, but it doesn't look like the @trifacta guys are focusing on it at the moment

@milimetric
Copy link

Hm, that would be sad if they abandoned it. The last major update was 5 months ago, so you may be right unfortunately.

I like all four improvement ideas you mention. We were looking at Vega to use as a generic visualization system at Wikimedia Foundation (analytics team). So if you fork it, there's a strong possibility that I'll help.

I agree that Vega has tons of potential, and that there's nothing else like it out there. The project I helped write, Limn, was trying the same approach - a visualization grammar. Our problem was that we had conflicting goals and lack of discipline, but Vega so far seems much cleaner.

@lianos
Copy link

lianos commented Feb 25, 2014

There was discussion the mailing list regarding the status of this project, to which Jeff responded that it is not dead, but hibernating given the demands on his time. His expectation was that his activity will pick up more in the spring:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/vega-js/ntJTzVupv8o

@gerwitz
Copy link

gerwitz commented Feb 25, 2014

See also a recent assurance from Heer on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/jeffrey_heer/status/430734460565200897

— Hans Gerwitz
[typed on glass]

On 25 Feb 2014, at 12:19, Steve Lianoglou notifications@github.com wrote:

There was discussion the mailing list regarding the status of this project, to which Jeff responded that it is not dead, but hibernating given the demands on his time. His expectation was that his activity will pick up more in the spring:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/vega-js/ntJTzVupv8o


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@hadley
Copy link
Contributor

hadley commented May 9, 2014

Related to #113

@arvind
Copy link
Member

arvind commented Jul 9, 2015

Vega certainly isn't abandoned :) As per @jaredly's request above:

use CommonJS module system (probably browserify)

Check!

fully unittest it (currently very minimal tests)

Check!

have a separate repo for the "playground"

Check! See vega/vega-editor

allow rich interactivity, not just highlight-on-hover

Check! See Signals and Predicates, and the interactive examples

We're very excited about Vega 2.0, we hope you all are too :)

@arvind arvind closed this as completed Jul 9, 2015
@jaredly
Copy link
Author

jaredly commented Jul 9, 2015

@arvind thanks for sticking with this! I'm very happy to see this progress.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request For requesting new features or transforms
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants