Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multisig improvements for scaling #1503

Open
gordsport opened this issue Jan 9, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1497 or #1619
Open

Multisig improvements for scaling #1503

gordsport opened this issue Jan 9, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1497 or #1619
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@gordsport
Copy link
Contributor

gordsport commented Jan 9, 2023

In order to scale the number of validators in the first 6 - 9 months we will investigate improvements to the multisig contract:

Edit, this should also cover:

Investigate the Gas costs/ amount of gas required for 30, 50… more for validators signing?

  • If gas costs increase we may need to consider batching
  • What costs per validator on other networks / other comparable actions on Ethereum (benchmark what gas costs seem reasonable)
  • Are there any indications of risk that gas costs will go up in the next 6-9 months?

Signature bundles?

  • Check rewards spec defines a mechanism about updating validator weights - contracts should be aligned
  • What can we do without batching
  • What is the least onerous process for the validators or is there some incentive to make the validators do it. Have to assume the weights won’t be updated every epoch? (do we need to write a tool for validators to facilitate this?)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants