chore: tweak PR labeler pattern #47395
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
balazsorban44
requested review from
timneutkens,
ijjk,
shuding,
huozhi,
feedthejim,
styfle,
padmaia and
jankaifer
as code owners
jankaifer
suggested changes
Mar 22, 2023
Co-authored-by: Jan Kaifer <jan@kaifer.cz>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Scope down what is being matched when labeling PRs
Why?
In #47367 the labeler added
area: next/imagebecause a test file name containedimageHow?
Removing Next Image component labeling as it provided no value for us.
Related: Slack thread, #46675