Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(pnpm): correctly parse dependency paths with nested peer dependecies #8003

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

chris-olszewski
Copy link
Contributor

@chris-olszewski chris-olszewski commented Apr 19, 2024

Description

Should address the reported issues in #7993

I missed a change to the dependency path format where nested peer dependencies are now shown e.g. if a has peer dependency b and b has peer dependency c, then the resulting dependency path will be a@1.0.0(b@1.0.0(c@1.0.0)).

Not sure when dependency path parsing got simplified, but I believe I missed the host segment getting dropped which greatly simplifies the format. The new parsing logic is a faithful port of the current JS parsing code: https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm/blob/main/packages/dependency-path/src/index.ts#L91

Testing Instructions

Added unit test for parsing a dependency path that contains a nested peer dependency. Existing test suite.

Closes TURBO-2848

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 19, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
examples-nonmonorepo ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 19, 2024 3:27pm
examples-vite-web 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 19, 2024 3:27pm
rust-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 19, 2024 3:27pm
7 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
examples-basic-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 19, 2024 3:27pm
examples-designsystem-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 19, 2024 3:27pm
examples-gatsby-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 19, 2024 3:27pm
examples-kitchensink-blog ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 19, 2024 3:27pm
examples-native-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 19, 2024 3:27pm
examples-svelte-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 19, 2024 3:27pm
examples-tailwind-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 19, 2024 3:27pm

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 19, 2024

🟢 Turbopack Benchmark CI successful 🟢

Thanks

@@ -170,9 +192,13 @@ mod tests {
#[test_case("foo@1.0.0", DepPath::new("foo", "1.0.0") ; "basic v7")]
#[test_case("@scope/foo@1.0.0", DepPath::new("@scope/foo", "1.0.0") ; "scope v7")]
#[test_case("foo@1.0.0(bar@1.2.3)", DepPath::new("foo", "1.0.0").with_peer_suffix(Some("(bar@1.2.3)")) ; "peer v7")]
#[test_case(
"eslint-module-utils@2.8.0(@typescript-eslint/parser@6.12.0(eslint@8.57.0)(typescript@5.3.3))",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yikes

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is an abridged example the full christian name is eslint-module-utils@2.8.0(@typescript-eslint/parser@6.12.0(eslint@8.57.0)(typescript@5.3.3))(eslint-import-resolver-node@0.3.9)(eslint-import-resolver-typescript@3.6.1(@typescript-eslint/parser@6.12.0(eslint@8.57.0)(typescript@5.3.3))(eslint-plugin-import@2.29.0)(eslint@8.57.0))(eslint@8.57.0)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💀


let (version, peer_suffix) = match version.find('(') {
Some(paren_index) if version.ends_with(')') => {
// TODO: safety of the split?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👀

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, old comment. I had an off by one error previously 😅

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 19, 2024

🟢 CI successful 🟢

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants