Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make npm not prefer offline #2102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2019
Merged

Make npm not prefer offline #2102

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2019

Conversation

leo
Copy link
Contributor

@leo leo commented Apr 5, 2019

This PR brings the change that slipped into this release commit to master.

@leo leo added the enhancement label Apr 5, 2019
@leo leo requested a review from amio April 5, 2019 13:39
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@70c2c42). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #2102   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage          ?   4.53%           
========================================
  Files             ?     243           
  Lines             ?    8580           
  Branches          ?     874           
========================================
  Hits              ?     389           
  Misses            ?    8174           
  Partials          ?      17
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/commands/dev/lib/builder-cache.ts 0% <0%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 70c2c42...b63ec8d. Read the comment docs.

@leo leo merged commit 4f639e6 into master Apr 5, 2019
@leo leo deleted the remove-prefer-offline branch April 5, 2019 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants