Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate bedrock-specific code to a separate repo #2

Closed
dmitrizagidulin opened this issue Sep 19, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Separate bedrock-specific code to a separate repo #2

dmitrizagidulin opened this issue Sep 19, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@dmitrizagidulin
Copy link
Contributor

It came up in conversation earlier today that the reason this repo is not being used in any of the did client type libraries (did-client, did-io, did-veres-one etc) is that it includes Bedrock components (for example https://github.com/veres-one/veres-one-context/blob/master/lib/index.js#L9 ).

The proposed solution was to have two separate repos, one repo for just the context file itself (probably this one), and then a separate repo that does the importing and injecting of the Bedrock components (that's currently happening in lib/index.js).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant