Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #128 accumulating nodes #142

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 9, 2023

Conversation

vmorsiani
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation:

Fix for #128

We have a scenario where we have multiple verticles which are used to index large sets of data.
each verticle register a consumer on an address such "indexing.<session_id>" where the session id is a uuid (dynamic)
once the indexing is done the consumer are unregistered and properly deleted, but the parent node not removed.

Using a Container as Parent solves the issue.
Conformance:

Your commits should be signed and you should have signed the Eclipse Contributor Agreement as explained in https://github.com/eclipse/vert.x/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
Please also make sure you adhere to the code style guidelines: https://github.com/vert-x3/wiki/wiki/Vert.x-code-style-guidelines

Copy link
Contributor

@tsegismont tsegismont left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @vmorsiani , the test suite passes on my box.

@tsegismont tsegismont merged commit eb58d75 into vert-x3:master May 9, 2023
2 of 3 checks passed
tsegismont pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2023
@vmorsiani vmorsiani deleted the #128_fix_accumulating_nodes branch May 23, 2023 08:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants