Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert $lib.bytes deprecation #3576

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

vEpiphyte
Copy link
Contributor

This will be marked as deprecated in a subsequent release after power-ups have been cut over to using $lib.axon. This would probably be 2.164.0 or 2.165.0.

This will be marked as deprecated in a subsequent release.
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added enhancement reqChangelog requires changelog labels Feb 21, 2024
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added this to the v2.163.0 milestone Feb 21, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (3d942e6) 97.65% compared to head (bac046a) 97.54%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3576      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.65%   97.54%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         234      234              
  Lines       49629    49619      -10     
==========================================
- Hits        48463    48403      -60     
- Misses       1166     1216      +50     
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 97.54% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
linux_replay ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte merged commit 4684ac9 into master Feb 21, 2024
5 checks passed
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte deleted the feat_backout_bytes_deprecation branch February 21, 2024 16:10
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte removed the reqChangelog requires changelog label Feb 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants