Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The expression's depth exceeds the maximum depth:512 #4816

Closed
son2408 opened this issue Nov 2, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

The expression's depth exceeds the maximum depth:512 #4816

son2408 opened this issue Nov 2, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
invalid Solution: this issue is invalid and will be closed type/question Type: question about the product

Comments

@son2408
Copy link

son2408 commented Nov 2, 2022

image
@wey-gu
Copy link
Contributor

wey-gu commented Nov 2, 2022

We could enlarge this configuration from GraphD:

max_expression_depth

By default it's indeed 512 :)

@son2408
Copy link
Author

son2408 commented Nov 2, 2022

I don't find max_expression_depth option in this nebula-graphd.conf
image

@son2408
Copy link
Author

son2408 commented Nov 2, 2022

We could enlarge this configuration from GraphD:

max_expression_depth

By default it's indeed 512 :)

Where is the configuration GraphD ?

@Sophie-Xie
Copy link
Contributor

We could enlarge this configuration from GraphD:
max_expression_depth
By default it's indeed 512 :)

Where is the configuration GraphD ?

nebula-graphd.conf is right. Add max_expression_depth in it.

@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added the type/question Type: question about the product label Nov 2, 2022
@wey-gu
Copy link
Contributor

wey-gu commented Nov 2, 2022

I don't find max_expression_depth option in this nebula-graphd.conf image

it's exactly under this file you are showing, not all configurations are listed here, some of them are omit with default values to reduce configuration surface to fresh users.

just add another line like

--max_expression_depth=1024

@wey-gu wey-gu mentioned this issue Nov 5, 2022
Closed
@jinyingsunny jinyingsunny added the invalid Solution: this issue is invalid and will be closed label Nov 11, 2022
@wey-gu wey-gu mentioned this issue Nov 12, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
invalid Solution: this issue is invalid and will be closed type/question Type: question about the product
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@wey-gu @son2408 @Sophie-Xie @jinyingsunny