use webwackify for webworkers to support webpack bundle #50
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Regarding the
require.resolve:webpack resolves module names to ids during compile time. One of the issues with webworkify-webpack-dropin was that it used regex to search for the
requirestatements to get the resolved module id so it could properly setup the bootstrapfn to start at the right module. This broke in some cases with minification because the regex would get messed up. By passing the module id directly from require.resolve, you dont have to do any of the regex work, and can just build the entire module list and have the starting id given to you. This problem is described in more detail here videojs/videojs-contrib-hls#600 (comment)