Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Fix simple typo, intial -> initial #6851

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2020
Merged

docs: Fix simple typo, intial -> initial #6851

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2020

Conversation

timgates42
Copy link
Contributor

There is a small typo in src/js/player.js, src/js/tech/html5.js, test/unit/sourceset.test.js.

Should read initial rather than intial.

There is a small typo in src/js/player.js, src/js/tech/html5.js, test/unit/sourceset.test.js.

Should read `initial` rather than `intial`.
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Sep 22, 2020

💖 Thanks for opening this pull request! 💖

Things that will help get your PR across the finish line:

  • Run npm run lint -- --errors locally to catch formatting errors earlier.
  • Include tests when adding/changing behavior.
  • Include screenshots and animated GIFs whenever possible.

We get a lot of pull requests on this repo, so please be patient and we will get back to you as soon as we can.

Copy link
Member

@gkatsev gkatsev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

haha, good find, thanks!

@gkatsev gkatsev merged commit f22ead1 into videojs:main Sep 22, 2020
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Sep 22, 2020

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉🎉🎉

edirub pushed a commit to edirub/video.js that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2023
There is a small typo in src/js/player.js, src/js/tech/html5.js, test/unit/sourceset.test.js.

Should read `initial` rather than `intial`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants