-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
Releasing new version #298
Comments
Is this project dead? I'm guessing so? |
It's replaced by Django-viewflow fsm module https://docs.viewflow.io/fsm/index.html |
@kmmbvnr ok so we should migrate away from this project altogether ? Any reason why this project still exists and is not archived, maybe not a bad idea to update the README.md? |
I'm also not clear as to what's going to happen to this library. Looking at the Readme of this and viewflow, it seemed like django-fsm is still being developed in parallel as the open source limited features variant of paid viewflow. But the above statement sounds very different. Does that mean that what's already in master but not released yet (e.g. django4 fixes, see 2.8.1...master) or PRs like #297 are never going to be merged and released within this library and that starting a new project with django-fsm is not a good idea since it's effectively deprecated and instead people should be moving to viewflow? Or are you @kmmbvnr going to focus your personal time and effort on viewflow (since this rewards your time with the license fee)? Is this repo then going to be archived or is this library potentially going to move to https://jazzband.co/ (where django-fsm-log already is maintained)? I'm about to start django-fsm using this productively in a commercial project, so clarity is important also to make a decision whether it makes sense to look at viewflow and potentially even pay for it. Thanks for your efforts on all these projects that are helping countless developers, really looking forward to better understand what your plan is @kmmbvnr |
What do you think about moving its maintenance to Jazzband so that we can keep maintaining it? |
@kmmbvnr the workflow and code logic in viewflow is quite different from django-fsm. Same as @ds-clearago , can you elaborate on your plan for django-fsm. Thx. |
@Natim The Jazzband issue is being discussed already in #285 and #298 So I think it comes down to what @kmmbvnr is planning with django-fsm and viewflow. Looking at https://github.com/kmmbvnr/django-material being archived on Apr 12, 2023 in favor of viewflow but also no answer in viewflow/viewflow#400 "Is there a guide for seamless transition from django-material to django-viewflow?" since Oct 12th my best guess is that he's busy at the moment with other things in life rather than these packages... |
We are ok to do the job with @pfouque Ultimately we will start a django-fsm-2 |
@kmmbvnr Is there any news from your side on this? Perhaps considering the developments visible in viewflow/viewflow#407 (comment) and pfouque/django-fsm-2#14 ? |
While there is no reply here, there has been a relevant comment on this elsewhere:
|
Thanks @ds-clearago django-viewflow v2 is still in beta and published as a pre-release on Pypi. Lastest release is from september 2023. Even if I like the decoupling between the "flow" (state machine) and actual models in viewflow vs having heavy models in django-fsm, both options seem valid to me. Can't see why we couldn't have django-fsm in parrallel of django-viewflow. I understand perfectly if @kmmbvnr doesn't want to maintain this library and viewflow. |
Guys, Viewflow would be released soon as a stable. viewflow.fsm is the django-fsm (3.0) django-fsm 2.x was released as 2014 has several design flaws and quite obsolete |
I would love having new version with fixes for django 4.1+ (eg. #289). It would greatly simplify my dependency management :)
Is there anything I can do to help with new release?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: