Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Bomb indicator #992

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 5, 2016
Merged

Add Bomb indicator #992

merged 1 commit into from Feb 5, 2016

Conversation

chrisbra
Copy link
Member

@chrisbra chrisbra commented Feb 5, 2016

No description provided.

chrisbra added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2016
@chrisbra chrisbra merged commit 8909402 into vim-airline:master Feb 5, 2016
@bling
Copy link
Member

bling commented Feb 5, 2016

emoji! http://emojipedia.org/bomb/

@chrisbra
Copy link
Member Author

chrisbra commented Feb 5, 2016

Interesting. But I am not sure everybody would understand what it stands for...

I am not sure about it.

@bling
Copy link
Member

bling commented Feb 5, 2016

nope, i certainly didn't. although this is probably a rare enough use case that perhaps it should be expanded to [bom], because i certainly wouldn't know what b by itself stands for.

@chrisbra
Copy link
Member Author

chrisbra commented Feb 5, 2016

okay, lets make it BOM then.

@chrisbra chrisbra deleted the bomb_indicator branch February 6, 2016 15:34
ghost pushed a commit to pachisb/powerline that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2019
PH111P pushed a commit to powerline/powerline that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2019
PH111P added a commit to powerline/powerline that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2019
* Added [BOM] (byte-order-mark) text in file encoding info

Like in vim-airline
See vim-airline/vim-airline#992 and vim-airline/vim-airline@fdb74f5

Ref #2015

* Test with no text added, to check travis results

* make bom a sepaate segment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants