🐛 denops#notify() should NOT return value
#324
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update involves a modification in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #324 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.81% 89.81%
=======================================
Files 9 9
Lines 648 648
Branches 61 61
=======================================
Hits 582 582
Misses 66 66 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- autoload/denops.vim (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
autoload/denops.vim (2)
- 1-4: The modification from a
returnto acallstatement in thedenops#notifyfunction correctly addresses the issue of the function returning a value when it should not. This change ensures that the function now properly invokesdenops#_internal#server#chan#notifywithout returning its result, which is the expected behavior for a notification function. This adjustment aligns with the PR's objective and follows best practices for notification functions in asynchronous systems.- 1-5: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [5-22]
Upon reviewing the rest of the provided code, it appears that the change to the
denops#notifyfunction is isolated and does not directly impact the functionality of other parts of the file, such asdenops#request,denops#request_async, or the configuration settings. It's important to ensure that any code that previously depended on the return value ofdenops#notify(if any) is reviewed and updated accordingly, although this change is expected to be safe given the nature of notification functions.Verification successful
The search results confirm that
denops#notifyis designed for use cases where no return value is expected, as outlined in the documentation. This aligns with the initial review comment's implication that changes todenops#notifyshould not adversely affect other parts of the codebase, given its intended use for fire-and-forget notifications. Therefore, the concern about ensuring no code improperly relies on the return value ofdenops#notifyis addressed by the clear documentation and usage patterns within the codebase.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that no part of the codebase improperly relies on the return value of `denops#notify`. # This script is a placeholder for the concept and should be adapted to the project's actual structure and testing framework. echo "Manual verification needed to ensure no dependencies on denops#notify return value."Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to `denops#notify` in the codebase to assess potential dependencies on its return value. rg "denops#notify" --context 5Length of output: 2239
SSIA
Summary by CodeRabbit