Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow more alignment sections in statusline (ported from Neovim). #11970

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yegappan
Copy link
Member

Co-authored-by: TJ DeVries devries.timothyj@gmail.com

Fixes #11965.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #11970 (100c9ae) into master (c4b7dec) will decrease coverage by 9.02%.
The diff coverage is 92.30%.

❗ Current head 100c9ae differs from pull request most recent head 814e28a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 814e28a to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #11970      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.93%   72.91%   -9.02%     
==========================================
  Files         164      160       -4     
  Lines      193942   189616    -4326     
  Branches    43804    43200     -604     
==========================================
- Hits       158903   138264   -20639     
- Misses      22205    39090   +16885     
+ Partials    12834    12262     -572     
Flag Coverage Δ
huge-clang-none ?
huge-gcc-none 53.40% <92.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
huge-gcc-testgui ?
huge-gcc-unittests ?
linux 53.40% <92.00%> (-28.96%) ⬇️
mingw-x64-HUGE 76.52% <95.65%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
mingw-x86-HUGE 76.99% <95.65%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
windows 78.11% <95.65%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/buffer.c 76.84% <92.00%> (-10.80%) ⬇️
src/optionstr.c 92.18% <100.00%> (-0.10%) ⬇️
src/os_unix.c 0.00% <0.00%> (-66.87%) ⬇️
src/hardcopy.c 12.00% <0.00%> (-65.11%) ⬇️
src/xdiff/xpatience.c 17.24% <0.00%> (-64.75%) ⬇️
src/if_tcl.c 20.51% <0.00%> (-61.13%) ⬇️
src/if_cscope.c 12.31% <0.00%> (-56.33%) ⬇️
src/gui_gtk_x11.c 0.00% <0.00%> (-51.74%) ⬇️
src/if_ruby.c 39.56% <0.00%> (-43.91%) ⬇️
src/term.c 34.70% <0.00%> (-39.58%) ⬇️
... and 139 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Co-authored-by: TJ DeVries <devries.timothyj@gmail.com>
@brammool brammool closed this in 3ec78f9 Feb 11, 2023
zeertzjq added a commit to zeertzjq/neovim that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2023
Problem:    'statusline' only supports one "%=" item.
Solution:   Add support for multiple "%=" items. (TJ DeVries, Yegappan
            Lakshmanan, closes vim/vim#11970, closes vim/vim#11965)

vim/vim@3ec78f9

Co-authored-by: Yegappan Lakshmanan <yegappan@yahoo.com>
zeertzjq added a commit to zeertzjq/neovim that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2023
Problem:    'statusline' only supports one "%=" item.
Solution:   Add support for multiple "%=" items. (TJ DeVries, Yegappan
            Lakshmanan, closes vim/vim#11970, closes vim/vim#11965)

vim/vim@3ec78f9

Co-authored-by: Yegappan Lakshmanan <yegappan@yahoo.com>
zeertzjq added a commit to neovim/neovim that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2023
Problem:    'statusline' only supports one "%=" item.
Solution:   Add support for multiple "%=" items. (TJ DeVries, Yegappan
            Lakshmanan, closes vim/vim#11970, closes vim/vim#11965)

vim/vim@3ec78f9

Co-authored-by: Yegappan Lakshmanan <yegappan@yahoo.com>
yesean pushed a commit to yesean/neovim that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2023
…22218)

Problem:    'statusline' only supports one "%=" item.
Solution:   Add support for multiple "%=" items. (TJ DeVries, Yegappan
            Lakshmanan, closes vim/vim#11970, closes vim/vim#11965)

vim/vim@3ec78f9

Co-authored-by: Yegappan Lakshmanan <yegappan@yahoo.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow more alignment sections in statusline
1 participant