Make order of 'info' in completion_info consistent #12971
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Start the iteration from the same point and follow the same direction as done when assigning the completion numbers. This way we remove the dependance on the completion direction and make the order of 'info' consistent. Fixes vim#12230
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #12971 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.04% 82.06% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 160 160
Lines 194679 194769 +90
Branches 43696 43712 +16
==========================================
+ Hits 159717 159837 +120
+ Misses 22095 22065 -30
Partials 12867 12867
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
|
Thanks. I think it makes sense to refactor into a separate function. Let me include this. |
zeertzjq
added a commit
to zeertzjq/neovim
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2023
Problem: complete_info() returns wrong index Solution: Make order of 'info' in completion_info consistent Start the iteration from the same point and follow the same direction as done when assigning the completion numbers. This way we remove the dependence on the completion direction and make the order of 'info' consistent. closes: vim/vim#12230 closes: vim/vim#12971 vim/vim@69fb5af Co-authored-by: LemonBoy <thatlemon@gmail.com>
zeertzjq
added a commit
to neovim/neovim
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2023
Problem: complete_info() returns wrong index Solution: Make order of 'info' in completion_info consistent Start the iteration from the same point and follow the same direction as done when assigning the completion numbers. This way we remove the dependence on the completion direction and make the order of 'info' consistent. closes: vim/vim#12230 closes: vim/vim#12971 vim/vim@69fb5af Co-authored-by: LemonBoy <thatlemon@gmail.com>
|
is this possible did not handle or update index of 'selected' not well when textchangdp or cursormovedi event? |
|
possibly 🤷 |
|
// #12230 (comment) |
Shane-XB-Qian
added a commit
to Shane-XB-Qian/vim
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2023
Signed-off-by: shane.xb.qian <shane.qian@foxmail.com>
jaehoonhwang
pushed a commit
to jaehoonhwang/neovim
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2023
Problem: complete_info() returns wrong index Solution: Make order of 'info' in completion_info consistent Start the iteration from the same point and follow the same direction as done when assigning the completion numbers. This way we remove the dependence on the completion direction and make the order of 'info' consistent. closes: vim/vim#12230 closes: vim/vim#12971 vim/vim@69fb5af Co-authored-by: LemonBoy <thatlemon@gmail.com>
chrisbra
added a commit
to chrisbra/vim
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2023
When moving through the insert completion menu and switching directions,
we need to make sure we start at the correct position in the list and
move correctly forward/backwards through it, so that we do not skip
entries and the selected item points to the correct entry in the list
of completion entries generated by the completion_info() function.
The general case is this:
1) CTRL-X CTRL-N, we will traverse the list starting from
compl_first_match and then go forwards (using the cp->next pointer)
through the list (skipping the very first entry, which has the
CP_ORIGINAL_TEXT flag set (since that is the empty/non-selected entry
2) CTRL-X CTRL-P, we will traverse the list starting from
compl_first_match (which now points to the last entry). The previous
entry will have the CP_ORIGINAL_TEXT flag set, so we need to start
traversing the list from the second prev pointer.
There are in fact 2 special cases after starting the completion menu
with CTRL-X:
3) CTRL-N and then going backwards by pressing CTRL-P again.
compl_first_match will point to the same entry as in step 1 above,
but since compl_dir_foward() has been switched by pressing CTRL-P
to backwards we need to pretend to be in still in case 1 and still
traverse the list in forward direction using the cp_next pointer
4) CTRL-P and then going forwards by pressing CTRL-N again.
compl_first_match will point to the same entry as in step 2 above,
but since compl_dir_foward() has been switched by pressing CTRL-N
to forwards we need to pretend to be in still in case 2 and still
traverse the list in backward direction using the cp_prev pointer
related: vim#13402
related: vim#12971
Shane-XB-Qian
added a commit
to Shane-XB-Qian/vim
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2023
// to repro and test 'index out of range' err Signed-off-by: shane.xb.qian <shane.qian@foxmail.com>
chrisbra
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2023
Problem: Completion menu may be wrong
Solution: Check for the original direction of the completion menu,
add more tests, make it work with 'noselect'
completion: move in right direction when filling completion_info()
When moving through the insert completion menu and switching directions,
we need to make sure we start at the correct position in the list and
move correctly forward/backwards through it, so that we do not skip
entries and the selected item points to the correct entry in the list
of completion entries generated by the completion_info() function.
The general case is this:
1) CTRL-X CTRL-N, we will traverse the list starting from
compl_first_match and then go forwards (using the cp->next pointer)
through the list (skipping the very first entry, which has the
CP_ORIGINAL_TEXT flag set (since that is the empty/non-selected entry
2) CTRL-X CTRL-P, we will traverse the list starting from
compl_first_match (which now points to the last entry). The previous
entry will have the CP_ORIGINAL_TEXT flag set, so we need to start
traversing the list from the second prev pointer.
There are in fact 2 special cases after starting the completion menu
with CTRL-X:
3) CTRL-N and then going backwards by pressing CTRL-P again.
compl_first_match will point to the same entry as in step 1 above,
but since compl_dir_foward() has been switched by pressing CTRL-P
to backwards we need to pretend to be in still in case 1 and still
traverse the list in forward direction using the cp_next pointer
4) CTRL-P and then going forwards by pressing CTRL-N again.
compl_first_match will point to the same entry as in step 2 above,
but since compl_dir_foward() has been switched by pressing CTRL-N
to forwards we need to pretend to be in still in case 2 and still
traverse the list in backward direction using the cp_prev pointer
For the 'noselect' case however, this is slightly different again. When
going backwards, we only need to go one cp_prev pointer back. And
resting of the direction works again slightly different. So we need to
take the noselect option into account when deciding in which direction
to iterate through the list of matches.
related: #13402
related: #12971
closes: #13408
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
zeertzjq
added a commit
to zeertzjq/neovim
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2023
Problem: Completion menu may be wrong
Solution: Check for the original direction of the completion menu,
add more tests, make it work with 'noselect'
completion: move in right direction when filling completion_info()
When moving through the insert completion menu and switching directions,
we need to make sure we start at the correct position in the list and
move correctly forward/backwards through it, so that we do not skip
entries and the selected item points to the correct entry in the list
of completion entries generated by the completion_info() function.
The general case is this:
1) CTRL-X CTRL-N, we will traverse the list starting from
compl_first_match and then go forwards (using the cp->next pointer)
through the list (skipping the very first entry, which has the
CP_ORIGINAL_TEXT flag set (since that is the empty/non-selected entry
2) CTRL-X CTRL-P, we will traverse the list starting from
compl_first_match (which now points to the last entry). The previous
entry will have the CP_ORIGINAL_TEXT flag set, so we need to start
traversing the list from the second prev pointer.
There are in fact 2 special cases after starting the completion menu
with CTRL-X:
3) CTRL-N and then going backwards by pressing CTRL-P again.
compl_first_match will point to the same entry as in step 1 above,
but since compl_dir_foward() has been switched by pressing CTRL-P
to backwards we need to pretend to be in still in case 1 and still
traverse the list in forward direction using the cp_next pointer
4) CTRL-P and then going forwards by pressing CTRL-N again.
compl_first_match will point to the same entry as in step 2 above,
but since compl_dir_foward() has been switched by pressing CTRL-N
to forwards we need to pretend to be in still in case 2 and still
traverse the list in backward direction using the cp_prev pointer
For the 'noselect' case however, this is slightly different again. When
going backwards, we only need to go one cp_prev pointer back. And
resting of the direction works again slightly different. So we need to
take the noselect option into account when deciding in which direction
to iterate through the list of matches.
related: vim/vim#13402
related: vim/vim#12971
closes: vim/vim#13408
vim/vim@daef8c7
Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Start the iteration from the same point and follow the same direction as done when assigning the completion numbers. This way we remove the dependance on the completion direction and make the order of 'info' consistent.
Fixes #12230
Some more testing and/or a thorough review would be greatly appreciated ;)