Skip to content
Erlang NIF examples for showing Erlang scheduler issues
Branch: master
Clone or download
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.
c_src Add NIF upgrade function Oct 30, 2015
Makefile Slides and example code for Chicago Erlang 2014 NIF presentation Sep 22, 2014 Additions due to CodeMesh talk Nov 3, 2014
vinoski-opt-native-code.pdf Fix the timeslice calculation in the exor2 function Sep 25, 2014
vinoski-schedulers.pdf fix hyperlinks in vinoski-schedule slideset Nov 5, 2014

bitwise: NIF examples showing Erlang scheduler concerns

The bitwise module implements several Erlang Native Implemented Functions (NIFs) intended to show several different effects NIFs can have on Erlang scheduler threads. The module supplies several variants of a function exor/2 that takes a binary and a byte value and applies exclusive-or of that byte to every byte in the binary and returns a new binary of the resulting values. These variants operate as follows:

  • One example, exor_bad/2, shows a misbehaving NIF that, given a large enough input binary, takes up far too much time on a scheduler thread, running for multiple seconds. Normally, a NIF should run on a scheduler thread for only a millisecond or less.

  • Another example uses Erlang code to break the large input binary into 4MB chunks, calling exor_bad/2 separately for each chunk and then reassembling the results.

  • The exor_yield/2 variant uses the enif_schedule_nif function, introduced in Erlang/OTP 17.3, to ensure the NIF yields the scheduler thread after consuming a 1 millisecond timeslice. It uses enif_schedule_nif to reschedule itself to run in the future to continue its exclusive-or operation on the input binary.

  • The final variant, exor_dirty/2, uses dirty schedulers, introduced as an experimental feature in Erlang 17.0. This approach schedules the NIF to run on a dirty scheduler thread rather than a regular scheduler thread. Since dirty scheduler threads are not managed threads, they are not constrained the same way regular scheduler threads are with respect to long-running CPU- or I/O-intensive tasks.

This code was originally presented at Chicago Erlang, 22 Sep 2014. The code has evolved since that talk, including a fix for the example of how enif_consume_timeslice() and enif_schedule_nif() are used together. In the Chicago Erlang presentation, the code presented for this area miscalculated timeslice percentages; this has been fixed. The slides have been updated to include this fix as well, which means the slides here, in the file vinoski-opt-native-code.pdf, differ from those originally presented.

This code was also presented at CodeMesh 2014, 5 Nov 2014. The slides for that talk, which are in the file vinoski-schedulers.pdf, include more details than those for the Chicago Erlang talk, specifically about a possible dirty driver API.

Long Scheduling

A useful Erlang feature not shown in the code or the Chicago Erlang slides, but mentioned in the CodeMesh slides, is the ability to detect when native code spends too much time on a regular scheduler thread by calling erlang:system_monitor/2 with the {long_schedule, Time} option. For example, the following code can be interactively run in an Erlang shell to cause the shell to receive messages when any NIFs execute on a regular scheduler thread for 10ms or more:

1> erlang:system_monitor(self(), [{long_schedule, 10}]).

If any NIF executions meet or exceed the 10ms limit, the shell will receive messages similar to the following:

2> spawn(fun() -> bitwise:exor(LargeBinary, 16#5A) end).
3> flush().
Shell got {monitor,<0.39.0>,long_schedule,

Here, the {timeout, 6018} portion of the message shows that bitwise:exor/2 executed for slightly more than 6 seconds.

See the erlang:system_monitor/2 documentation for more details.

You can’t perform that action at this time.