Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Back to dev mode after v17.0.1 #13663

Merged

Conversation

frouioui
Copy link
Member

Includes the changes required to go back into dev mode (v17.0.2-SNAPSHOT) after the release of v17.0.1.

Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <florent.poinsard@outlook.fr>
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Jul 28, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • If this is a change that users need to know about, please apply the release notes (needs details) label so that merging is blocked unless the summary release notes document is included.
  • If a test is added or modified, there should be a documentation on top of the test to explain what the expected behavior is what the test does.

If a new flag is being introduced:

  • Is it really necessary to add this flag?
  • Flag names should be clear and intuitive (as far as possible)
  • Help text should be descriptive.
  • Flag names should use dashes (-) as word separators rather than underscores (_).

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow should be required, the maintainer team should be notified.

Bug fixes

  • There should be at least one unit or end-to-end test.
  • The Pull Request description should include a link to an issue that describes the bug.

Non-trivial changes

  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.

New/Existing features

  • Should be documented, either by modifying the existing documentation or creating new documentation.
  • New features should have a link to a feature request issue or an RFC that documents the use cases, corner cases and test cases.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from VTop, if used there.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Jul 28, 2023
@frouioui frouioui removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request labels Jul 28, 2023
@frouioui frouioui added this to the v17.0.2 milestone Jul 31, 2023
@frouioui frouioui added Component: General Changes throughout the code base and removed Component: General Changes throughout the code base labels Aug 7, 2023
@shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor

Upgrade Downgrade Testing Reparent New Vtctl / Run Upgrade Downgrade Test keeps failing - I restarted it like 5 times.

@shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor

I removed Upgrade Downgrade Testing Reparent New Vtctl from Required tests list for release-17.0. Now merging.

@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach merged commit 2da865e into vitessio:release-17.0 Aug 8, 2023
112 of 117 checks passed
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach deleted the release-17.0-back_to_dev-1 branch August 8, 2023 06:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: General Changes throughout the code base Type: Release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants