Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add parsing support for Json schema validation functions #9971

Merged

Conversation

K-Kumar-01
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Adds the parsing support for JSON schema validation functions.
More information here.

Changes

  • Parser file grammar support.
  • Valid and Invalid test cases.

Related Issue(s)

#8604
#4099

Checklist

  • Should this PR be backported?
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Signed-off-by: Kushal Kumar <kushalkumargupta4@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kushal Kumar <kushalkumargupta4@gmail.com>
K-Kumar-01 and others added 6 commits April 5, 2022 23:03
Signed-off-by: Kushal Kumar <kushalkumargupta4@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kushal Kumar <kushalkumargupta4@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kushal Kumar <kushalkumargupta4@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Copy link
Member

@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great Work 🎉

Copy link
Member

@frouioui frouioui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Awesome 🎊

@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 merged commit cc62452 into vitessio:main Apr 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Query Serving Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants