[ Dynapi ] Dynamic api models #344
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added some test cases TODO: check template format and configure report format
…al paramters with initialization by default value and overriding setting in Parameter
Sparql construct language filtering test added
* fix: get back language filtering for sparql construct query * feat: LanguageFilteringRDFService sparqlConstructQuery tests added
…datorsTest.java Co-authored-by: Dragan Ivanovic <chenejac@uns.ac.rs>
…/conversion/ParameterConverterTest.java Co-authored-by: Dragan Ivanovic <chenejac@uns.ac.rs>
…datorsTest.java Co-authored-by: Dragan Ivanovic <chenejac@uns.ac.rs>
moved dynamic-api-implementation.n3 to dynapi model
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A follow up to this PR
What does this pull request do?
Moved dynamic api assertions and ontology into special models.
What's new?
Created dynapiTbox and dynapiAbox models
Created DynapiModelProvider to provide union of dynapiTbox and dynapiAbox with in-memory inferencing.
How should this be tested?
A description of what steps someone could take to:
Interested parties
Tag (@ mention) interested parties or, if unsure, @VIVO-project/vivo-committers