review into & soa

latex/Capitulos/Conclusions.aux

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 \relax 
 \providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {6}Conclusions and future work}{29}{chapter.6}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {6}Conclusions and future work}{31}{chapter.6}}
 \@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
 \@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
 \citation{blum1988non}
 \citation{de2005publish}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6.1}Future Work}{30}{section.6.1}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6.1}Future Work}{32}{section.6.1}}
 \@setckpt{Capitulos/Conclusions}{
-\setcounter{page}{32}
+\setcounter{page}{34}
 \setcounter{equation}{0}
 \setcounter{enumi}{0}
 \setcounter{enumii}{0}
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 \setcounter{table}{0}
 \setcounter{NAT@ctr}{0}
 \setcounter{Item}{0}
-\setcounter{Hfootnote}{3}
+\setcounter{Hfootnote}{15}
 \setcounter{bookmark@seq@number}{34}
 \setcounter{ContinuedFloat}{0}
 \setcounter{KVtest}{0}
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 \setcounter{subtable@save}{0}
 \setcounter{lotdepth}{1}
 \setcounter{lstnumber}{1}
+\setcounter{@todonotes@numberoftodonotes}{1}
 \setcounter{section@level}{0}
 \setcounter{lstlisting}{0}
 }

latex/Capitulos/Introduction.aux

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}{chapter.1}}
 \@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
 \@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
+\newlabel{intro}{{1}{1}{Introduction}{chapter.1}{}}
 \citation{resnick2000reputation}
 \citation{callaham_relationship_2007}
 \citation{spier2002history}
@@ -59,6 +60,7 @@
 \setcounter{subtable@save}{0}
 \setcounter{lotdepth}{1}
 \setcounter{lstnumber}{1}
+\setcounter{@todonotes@numberoftodonotes}{0}
 \setcounter{section@level}{0}
 \setcounter{lstlisting}{0}
 }

latex/Capitulos/Introduction.tex

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 \chapter{Introduction}
-
+\label{intro}
 \begin{FraseCelebre}
   \begin{Frase}
     Who Watches the Watchmen?

latex/Capitulos/Platform.aux

@@ -1,46 +1,46 @@
 \relax 
 \providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
 \citation{callaham_relationship_2007}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {4}Platform Description}{15}{chapter.4}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {4}Platform Description}{17}{chapter.4}}
 \@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
 \@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.1}Transparent Peer Review Governance}{15}{section.4.1}}
-\newlabel{workflow}{{4.1}{15}{Transparent Peer Review Governance}{section.4.1}{}}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.1}{\ignorespaces Sequence diagram of platform interaction\relax }}{16}{figure.caption.8}}
-\newlabel{umlseq}{{4.1}{16}{Sequence diagram of platform interaction\relax }{figure.caption.8}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.1}Transparent Peer Review Governance}{17}{section.4.1}}
+\newlabel{workflow}{{4.1}{17}{Transparent Peer Review Governance}{section.4.1}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.1}{\ignorespaces Sequence diagram of platform interaction\relax }}{18}{figure.caption.10}}
+\newlabel{umlseq}{{4.1}{18}{Sequence diagram of platform interaction\relax }{figure.caption.10}{}}
 \citation{resnick2000reputation}
 \citation{van1999effect,schaub2016trustless}
 \citation{solomon2012study}
 \citation{bjork2014anatomy}
 \citation{benet_ipfs-content_2014}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.2}The Peer Review Reputation network}{17}{section.4.2}}
-\newlabel{reputation}{{4.2}{17}{The Peer Review Reputation network}{section.4.2}{}}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.3}Distributed Open Access infrastructure}{17}{section.4.3}}
-\newlabel{distributedOA}{{4.3}{17}{Distributed Open Access infrastructure}{section.4.3}{}}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.4}Privacy Settings of Open Peer Review and Rating}{17}{section.4.4}}
-\newlabel{privacy}{{4.4}{17}{Privacy Settings of Open Peer Review and Rating}{section.4.4}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.2}The Peer Review Reputation network}{19}{section.4.2}}
+\newlabel{reputation}{{4.2}{19}{The Peer Review Reputation network}{section.4.2}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.3}Distributed Open Access infrastructure}{19}{section.4.3}}
+\newlabel{distributedOA}{{4.3}{19}{Distributed Open Access infrastructure}{section.4.3}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.4}Privacy Settings of Open Peer Review and Rating}{19}{section.4.4}}
+\newlabel{privacy}{{4.4}{19}{Privacy Settings of Open Peer Review and Rating}{section.4.4}{}}
 \citation{lee2013bias}
 \citation{budden2008double}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.2}{\ignorespaces Review and Rating privacy models\relax }}{18}{figure.caption.9}}
-\newlabel{PrivacyReviewRating}{{4.2}{18}{Review and Rating privacy models\relax }{figure.caption.9}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.2}{\ignorespaces Review and Rating privacy models\relax }}{20}{figure.caption.11}}
+\newlabel{PrivacyReviewRating}{{4.2}{20}{Review and Rating privacy models\relax }{figure.caption.11}{}}
 \citation{ford2013defining}
 \citation{van1999effect}
 \citation{groves2010open}
 \citation{schaub2016trustless}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4.1}Anonymous Rating}{19}{subsection.4.4.1}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4.1}Anonymous Rating}{21}{subsection.4.4.1}}
 \citation{meiklejohn2015privacy}
 \citation{harrigan2016unreasonable,ranvierReusable}
 \citation{blum1988non,bitansky2013succinct}
 \citation{sasson2014zerocash}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.5}Architecture}{20}{section.4.5}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.5}Architecture}{22}{section.4.5}}
 \citation{croman2016scaling}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.3}{\ignorespaces Architecture diagram of a node with IPFS and an Ethereum light client\relax }}{21}{figure.caption.10}}
-\newlabel{plat:sec:architecture:diagram}{{4.3}{21}{Architecture diagram of a node with IPFS and an Ethereum light client\relax }{figure.caption.10}{}}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.5.1}Smart Contract Architecture}{21}{subsection.4.5.1}}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.4}{\ignorespaces Diagrama UML del la estructura de contratos\relax }}{23}{figure.caption.11}}
-\newlabel{plat:sec:scarchitecture:uml}{{4.4}{23}{Diagrama UML del la estructura de contratos\relax }{figure.caption.11}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.3}{\ignorespaces Architecture diagram of a node with IPFS and an Ethereum light client\relax }}{23}{figure.caption.12}}
+\newlabel{plat:sec:architecture:diagram}{{4.3}{23}{Architecture diagram of a node with IPFS and an Ethereum light client\relax }{figure.caption.12}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.5.1}Smart Contract Architecture}{23}{subsection.4.5.1}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.4}{\ignorespaces Diagrama UML del la estructura de contratos\relax }}{25}{figure.caption.13}}
+\newlabel{plat:sec:scarchitecture:uml}{{4.4}{25}{Diagrama UML del la estructura de contratos\relax }{figure.caption.13}{}}
 \@setckpt{Capitulos/Platform}{
-\setcounter{page}{24}
+\setcounter{page}{26}
 \setcounter{equation}{0}
 \setcounter{enumi}{0}
 \setcounter{enumii}{0}
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
 \setcounter{table}{0}
 \setcounter{NAT@ctr}{0}
 \setcounter{Item}{0}
-\setcounter{Hfootnote}{3}
+\setcounter{Hfootnote}{15}
 \setcounter{bookmark@seq@number}{30}
 \setcounter{ContinuedFloat}{0}
 \setcounter{KVtest}{0}
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
 \setcounter{subtable@save}{0}
 \setcounter{lotdepth}{1}
 \setcounter{lstnumber}{1}
+\setcounter{@todonotes@numberoftodonotes}{1}
 \setcounter{section@level}{0}
 \setcounter{lstlisting}{0}
 }

latex/Capitulos/Platform.tex

@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ \section{Architecture}
 running an IPFS node to upload the files as explained in the diagram of the
 figure \ref{plat:sec:architecture:diagram}.
 
-\figura{architecture.jpg}{width=0.9\linewidth}{plat:sec:architecture:diagram}{Architecture
+\figura{architecture.png}{width=0.9\linewidth}{plat:sec:architecture:diagram}{Architecture
   diagram of a node with IPFS and an Ethereum light client}
 
 \subsection{Smart Contract Architecture}

latex/Capitulos/Results.aux

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 \relax 
 \providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {5}Results and discussion}{25}{chapter.5}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {5}Results and discussion}{27}{chapter.5}}
 \@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
 \@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5.1}Cool Section}{25}{section.5.1}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5.1}Cool Section}{27}{section.5.1}}
 \@setckpt{Capitulos/Results}{
-\setcounter{page}{29}
+\setcounter{page}{31}
 \setcounter{equation}{0}
 \setcounter{enumi}{0}
 \setcounter{enumii}{0}
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 \setcounter{table}{0}
 \setcounter{NAT@ctr}{0}
 \setcounter{Item}{0}
-\setcounter{Hfootnote}{3}
+\setcounter{Hfootnote}{15}
 \setcounter{bookmark@seq@number}{32}
 \setcounter{ContinuedFloat}{0}
 \setcounter{KVtest}{0}
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 \setcounter{subtable@save}{0}
 \setcounter{lotdepth}{1}
 \setcounter{lstnumber}{1}
+\setcounter{@todonotes@numberoftodonotes}{1}
 \setcounter{section@level}{0}
 \setcounter{lstlisting}{0}
 }

latex/Capitulos/Soa.aux

@@ -1,25 +1,43 @@
 \relax 
 \providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
+\citation{willinsky2005open}
+\citation{binfield2013open,wellen2013open}
+\citation{bjork2015have}
+\citation{anderton2013continuous}
+\citation{haymanview}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {2}State of the art}{5}{chapter.2}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
+\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.1}Alternative Publication systems}{5}{section.2.1}}
+\citation{harnad2003electronic}
+\citation{brown2001volution}
+\citation{shuai2012scientific}
+\citation{sugiyama2010scholarly}
 \citation{bartlingblockchain}
 \citation{tennant2017multi}
 \citation{morton2017aletheia}
 \citation{dhillon2016bench}
+\citation{resnick2000reputation}
+\citation{josang2002beta}
+\citation{resnick2002trust}
+\citation{zhou2007powertrust}
+\citation{dotzer2005vars}
+\citation{adler2007content}
+\citation{sharples2016blockchain}
 \citation{fuster2010governance}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {2}State of the art}{5}{chapter.2}}
-\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
-\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.2}Reputation systems}{7}{section.2.2}}
 \@setckpt{Capitulos/Soa}{
-\setcounter{page}{7}
+\setcounter{page}{9}
 \setcounter{equation}{0}
 \setcounter{enumi}{0}
 \setcounter{enumii}{0}
 \setcounter{enumiii}{0}
 \setcounter{enumiv}{0}
-\setcounter{footnote}{1}
+\setcounter{footnote}{12}
 \setcounter{mpfootnote}{0}
 \setcounter{part}{0}
 \setcounter{chapter}{2}
-\setcounter{section}{0}
+\setcounter{section}{2}
 \setcounter{subsection}{0}
 \setcounter{subsubsection}{0}
 \setcounter{paragraph}{0}
@@ -28,8 +46,8 @@
 \setcounter{table}{0}
 \setcounter{NAT@ctr}{0}
 \setcounter{Item}{0}
-\setcounter{Hfootnote}{2}
-\setcounter{bookmark@seq@number}{12}
+\setcounter{Hfootnote}{13}
+\setcounter{bookmark@seq@number}{14}
 \setcounter{ContinuedFloat}{0}
 \setcounter{KVtest}{0}
 \setcounter{subfigure}{0}
@@ -39,6 +57,7 @@
 \setcounter{subtable@save}{0}
 \setcounter{lotdepth}{1}
 \setcounter{lstnumber}{1}
+\setcounter{@todonotes@numberoftodonotes}{0}
 \setcounter{section@level}{0}
 \setcounter{lstlisting}{0}
 }

latex/Capitulos/Soa.tex

@@ -13,20 +13,117 @@ \chapter{State of the art}
 % \section{Cooler Section}
 % -------------------------------------------------------------------
 
+
+
+\section{Alternative Publication systems}
+
+Publication systems, as seen on section \ref{intro} are vampirizing the
+industry, nevertheless there are some attempts to change this paradigm on behalf
+of science dissemination.
+
+Open journal systems~\cite{willinsky2005open} is an open software designed to
+facilitate the publishing process. This project was created by the Public
+Knowledge Project\footnote{https://pkp.sfu.ca/about/} and it targets open-access
+online journals that want to speed up the publication processes. The system
+provides tools to control the whole publishing process from article submission,
+through peer reviewing to the final publication issue.
+
+Mega-journals~(or Multi-journals)~\cite{binfield2013open,wellen2013open} combine
+multiple journals into a single journal, allowing the publication of open-access
+papers, which have gone through a peer review process. The first journal to
+adopt this idea is the \emph{PLOS ONE}
+Journal\footnote{http://journals.plos.org/plosone/} as of the project
+\emph{Public Library of Science}. Project that aims to create a library of
+scientific journals under the values of open access and creative commons
+licenses. As a result of the success of the \emph{PLOS ONE} journal, other
+publishers have started their own mega-journals. Featuring alternative impact
+metrics, reusability of figures and data, post-publication discussions and
+portable reviews from other journals~\cite{bjork2015have}.
+
+Continuous publication model is based on publishing individual papers migrating
+from the previous issue-based model~\cite{anderton2013continuous}. This method
+is seen as an altenative for open-access journals as it speeds up the
+publication process~\cite{haymanview}. \emph{DPSOS}\footnote{Decentralized
+  Publication System for Open Science} adopt this model by design (see
+section~\ref{tech:sec:ethereum:sm}) as it publish automatically the papers that
+meet certain preconditions that are written in the blockchain.
+
+Preprints are scientific papers that have not yet gone through the peer review
+process~\cite{harnad2003electronic}. Formerly, the preprints that were sent to
+the journals were private, and only accessible by the editors and assigned
+reviewers. But nowadays it is common to publish a preprint before sending it to
+a journal, uploading it to specialized platforms like arXiv
+\footnote{https://arxiv.org/} or Preprints
+\footnote{https://www.preprints.org/}~\cite{brown2001volution}. In fact there is
+a correlation bet@incollection{resnick2002trust, title={Trust among strangers in
+    Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system},
+  author={Resnick, Paul and Zeckhauser, Richard}, booktitle={The Economics of
+    the Internet and E-commerce}, pages={127--157}, year={2002},
+  publisher={Emerald Group Publishing Limited} }ween the upload of a preprint
+and the early citations after the publication of the
+paper~\cite{shuai2012scientific}. This system is a possible solution to the
+cold-start problem that have the papers of new researchers who enter the
+academic career~\cite{sugiyama2010scholarly}.
+
+Social networks have also made a dent in the academic world, creating platforms
+to contact other researchers and encouraging them to share open access papers.
+Some of the well known are Research Gate\footnote{https://www.researchgate.net},
+Mendeley \footnote{https://www.mendeley.com} or Academia
+\footnote{http://academia.edu}. But despite the good intentions of the creators
+of these platforms, many of the journals demand the copyright of the papers they
+publish, preventing the authors from sharing them through these services.
+
+
 Decentralized alternatives, despite their promises~\cite{bartlingblockchain},
 are still in their infancy. A few proposals, none of them functional to date,
-have appeared recently: a peer review proposal using
-cryptocurrencies~\cite{tennant2017multi}, a blockchain-enabled app with voting
-and storage of publications, again using
-cryptocurrencies~\cite{morton2017aletheia}, or a peer review quality control
-through blockchain-based cohort trainings~\cite{dhillon2016bench}. Additionally,
-Ledger\footnote{https://ledgerjournal.org} journal records the publication
+have appeared recently.
+
+A peer review proposal to solve some of the peer review socio-technical problems
+using cryptocurrencies~\cite{tennant2017multi}. It needs a critical threshold of
+research community engagement, changing the actual processes and platforms, to
+start being implemented.
+
+Blockchain-enabled apps have also been proposed, with voting and storage of
+publications. This is the case of Aletheia~\cite{morton2017aletheia}, a software
+for getting open access papers published. This platform idea aims to use
+blockchain as a decentralized and distributed database as a publishing platform.
+
+Peer review quality control through blockchain-based cohort
+trainings~\cite{dhillon2016bench} have been also proposed, with the promise of
+transparency and dezentralization using a distributed ledger. Research labs can
+use this training network to test their technology and reduce the risk for
+private investment opportunities.
+
+Finally, some of the off-chain journals are adapting to the demands of the
+current scientific community like Ledger\footnote{https://ledgerjournal.org}, a
+cryptocurrencies and blockchain based journal that records the publication
 timestamps in the Bitcoin blockchain.
 
-% Other platforms like Research Gate\footnote{https://www.researchgate.net},
-% Mendeley \footnote{https://www.mendeley.com} or Academia
-% \footnote{http://academia.edu} aim to create researcher social networks where
-% they share OA papers, improving science dissemination.
+\section{Reputation systems}
+
+Reputation systems today arise from the need to trust unknown
+individuals~\cite{resnick2000reputation}, many of the big internet communities
+like Stackexchange\footnote{https://stackexchange.com/} or
+reddit\footnote{https://www.reddit.com/} have their own reputation system.
+Reputation systems behavior may vary depending on the
+platform~\cite{josang2002beta}, but the most usual is where users get a score
+based on certain interaction with the community.
+
+Reputation systems also have a very large niche in e-commerce webs such as
+Ebay\footnote{https://www.ebay.com}, in which people pay for a product sold by
+an unknown vendor. There must be a previous trust in the vendor before buying
+any product, a reputation system offers an score given by other users to trust
+or not that certain seller~\cite{resnick2002trust}.
+
+Reputation systems vary widely in scope, such as one for peer-to-peer
+computing~\cite{zhou2007powertrust}, vehicle ad-hoc~\cite{dotzer2005vars} and
+even Wikipedia~\cite{adler2007content}. And all of them are based on an exchange
+of trust between users who use these services.
+
+This same concept was intended to be transferred within the blokchain using a
+token as a trust unit, in which users exchanged these as a sign of trust
+deposits among them~\cite{sharples2016blockchain}.
+
 
 This paper proposes the development of a decentralized publication system for
 open science. It aims to challenge the technical infrastructure that supports
@@ -45,8 +142,6 @@ \chapter{State of the art}
 and recognition of peer reviewers, and 3) the distribution of scientific
 knowledge. The following section provides an overview of the system features,
 while the final section discusses its challenges.
-
-
 %%%
 %%% Local Variables:
 %%% mode: latex