feat(forms): add required mark class #606
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
👋 @dtsanevmw,
Thank you, 🤖 Clarity Release Bot |
|
This PR introduces visual changes: 2f8c6fd |
dtsanevmw
force-pushed
the
dtsanevmw/cde-16
branch
from
14a1ab2
to
d4f5295
Compare
kevinbuhmann
changed the title
kevinbuhmann
previously approved these changes
Mar 28, 2023
kevinbuhmann
dismissed
their stale review
I'm no longer sure if a CSS class the best way to do this. One thing we need to determine is how this shoukd work for screen reader users. This might turn out to be a bit more involved.
dtsanevmw
force-pushed
the
dtsanevmw/cde-16
branch
from
d4f5295
to
a0df3be
Compare
|
This PR introduces visual changes: 5da5302 |
kevinbuhmann
reviewed
Apr 4, 2023
kevinbuhmann
approved these changes
Apr 4, 2023
Jinnie
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2023
AmyLiNow
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2023
dtsanevmw
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2023
## PR Checklist Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements: - [x] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features) - [x] Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features) - [x] If applicable, have a visual design approval ## PR Type What kind of change does this PR introduce? <!-- Please check the one that applies to this PR using "x". --> - [ ] Bugfix - [x] Feature - [ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables) - [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes) - [ ] Build related changes - [ ] CI related changes - [ ] Documentation content changes - [ ] Other... Please describe: ## What is the current behavior? All fields are assumed required and there is no way to tell that. Issue Number: CDE-16, #623 ## What is the new behavior? Added a class which can be used to mark a container as required. ## Does this PR introduce a breaking change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications below. --> ## Other information --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
dtsanevmw
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2023
backport of #606 --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 15.3.0 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
|
Hi there 👋, this is an automated message. To help Clarity keep track of discussions, we automatically lock closed PRs after 14 days. Please look for another open issue or open a new issue with updated details and reference this one as necessary. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
All fields are assumed required and there is no way to tell that.
Issue Number: CDE-16, #623
What is the new behavior?
Added a class which can be used to mark a container as required.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information