Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DNS for L4 LoadBalancer #1209

Open
0nebody opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

DNS for L4 LoadBalancer #1209

0nebody opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@0nebody
Copy link

0nebody commented Jul 19, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

With the changes made for compatibility between Avi Essential and external-dns it's not possible to use DNS with L4 unless autoFQDN is enabled.

DNS on L4 and automatic FQDN shouldn't be configured together. There are many use cases for DNS on L4 without enabling autoFQDN on every service.

Describe the solution you'd like

Create a method for users to create a DNS entry for L4 services without automatically creating it for every service. This could be another option for autoFQDN, or using a different annotation to external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/hostname.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@0nebody 0nebody added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 19, 2023
@swathinsankaran
Copy link
Member

@0nebody Could you please elaborate more on the use cases?

@0nebody
Copy link
Author

0nebody commented Jul 30, 2024

The use case is to create a DNS entry for services of type LoadBalancer without having an entry created for every load balancer. This may be because clusters share the default domain, or the scheme used by default or flat are incompatible. It will use existing logic in the application to create the DNS entry without needing to manually create the entry or use additional tools.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants