Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix mixup in condition to address lb rules #843

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2023
Merged

Conversation

annakhm
Copy link
Collaborator

@annakhm annakhm commented Feb 27, 2023

A negation was missing in assesment of rule change, that relates to provider version upgrade workaround. When no change in rules is detected, we assume current rules should be preserved, for sake of rules that were added manually on NSX when rule feature was not present in proveder.

In addition, fix inconsistent documentation.
Signed-off-by: Anna Khmelnitsky akhmelnitsky@vmware.com

A negation was missing in assesment of rule change, that relates to
provider version upgrade workaround. When no change in rules is
detected, we assume current rules should be preserved, for sake of
rules that were added manually on NSX when rule feature was not
present in proveder.

In addition, fix inconsistent documentation.
Signed-off-by: Anna Khmelnitsky <akhmelnitsky@vmware.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@ksamoray ksamoray left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@annakhm annakhm merged commit d72f8fc into master Feb 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

unable to add new rules in existing nsxt_policy_lb_virtual_server resource
2 participants