Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add custom_url_partial_match to context profile #850

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2023

Conversation

ksamoray
Copy link
Collaborator

@ksamoray ksamoray commented Mar 7, 2023

Context profile attributes are missing custom_url_partial_match field which was added in NSX 4.0

@ksamoray ksamoray force-pushed the custom_url_partial_match branch 4 times, most recently from 510d6ed to af768df Compare April 4, 2023 07:56
@annakhm
Copy link
Collaborator

annakhm commented Apr 5, 2023

Could we add a test for this?

@ksamoray ksamoray force-pushed the custom_url_partial_match branch 4 times, most recently from 53ca52a to b1fd5a2 Compare April 11, 2023 14:11
@ksamoray
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test-all

dependsOn := testAccNsxtPolicyContextProfileDependsOnTemplate("nsxt_policy_context_profile_custom_attribute.test")

resource.Test(t, resource.TestCase{
PreCheck: func() { testAccPreCheck(t); testAccNSXVersion(t, "3.0.0") },
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should the version be 4.0.0 in this check?

Context profile attributes are missing custom_url_partial_match field
which was added in NSX 4.0

Signed-off-by: Kobi Samoray <ksamoray@vmware.com>
@ksamoray
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test-all

@ksamoray ksamoray merged commit 4202d51 into vmware:master Apr 18, 2023
2 checks passed
@ksamoray ksamoray deleted the custom_url_partial_match branch April 18, 2023 06:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants