Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bsdtar: do not provide tar alternative #18833

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2020
Merged

Conversation

Chocimier
Copy link
Member

Alternative for tar was introduced to make switch from gnu tar to bsdtar in base-devel easier.

However, bsdtar has different interface than gnu tar, and with alternatives using gnu tar as tar is actually harder when it is needed.

There are also many user-used scripts assuming gnu tar, which are broken now. They should not be affected because of internal matters of packaging.

@Chocimier
Copy link
Member Author

@xtraeme, @pullmoll, @q66

@q66
Copy link
Contributor

q66 commented Feb 6, 2020

if we're dropping the alternative here, why not just drop it in tar as well?

Alternative for tar was introduced to make switch from gnu tar to bsdtar in base-devel easier.

However, bsdtar has different interface than gnu tar, and with alternatives using gnu tar as tar is actually harder when it is needed.

There are also many user-used scripts assuming gnu tar, which are broken now. They should not be affected because of internal matters of packaging.
@Chocimier
Copy link
Member Author

Chocimier commented Feb 6, 2020 via email

@xtraeme xtraeme merged commit 9816b3d into void-linux:master Feb 6, 2020
Copy link
Member

@pullmoll pullmoll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants